RE: Paradox of thrift21 Nov 2022 14:32
Alexa, show me how in two posts someone can prove that they:
1. Don't understand Ceteris Paribus
2. Have no understanding of inflation in theory and in practice
3. Have no understanding of basic economics
4. Don't understand much about the company about which they are posting
Congratulations Billy, you beat Alex to it.
The annual inflation rate for the twelve months ending October 22 in the US was 7.7%.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/273418/unadjusted-monthly-inflation-rate-in-the-us/#:~:text=In%20October%202022%2C%20prices%20had,data%20represents%20U.S.%20city%20averages.
Finance costs at the last half year were $49k ie., about 4.45%,
https://www.londonstockexchange.com/news-article/NTOG/interim-results-for-the-period-ended-30-june-2022/15651448
So the interest rate we are paying on the WAFD facility is less than inflation, not more. At that rate of interest NTOG should be borrowing as much as it can and buying producing assets.
Lets suppose the current market price per flowing barrel is $35,000, that NTOG can 100% debt fund it, NTOG interest rate is 4.45% and it can sell a barrel for $80,so $60 of lift costs and $40 net of mineral rights share. So
Annual interest charge is $1,557.50
Net to NTOG of 1 bopd is about 365 x 40 = $14,600
Plus the real value of the debt is being reduced by about 7.7% pa.
Net of the interest charge we are looking at $13,042.
So if NTOG can buy production plus some PDNP, PUD and some workover opportunities at less than $35k per flowing barrel it should do so. It can repay the debt out of cashflow in less than 3 years.
DYOR