RE: Lithium26 Nov 2024 14:21
If I am the serious drag on RRR because all the non-shareholders don't like that I post, are you telling me if I didn't post you would up your position to the equivalent of two London Pub lunches? I am sure your £20 top up will drive the price through the roof.
The problem with your argument is cognitive dissonance.
In some posts it is all about non-delivery over 20 years or incompetent management or dilution or that DRC will never deliver or that BF will never deliver or that Australia will never deliver or the management are crooks or involved in child exploitation and so on ad nauseum. But no the fact that I post to correct your misrepresentations is the problem today? If all the other drivel is irrelevant, why go on about it 24/7?
Like when insisted that when I mentioned Julian Rupare's name it was inside information? When in reality his name is in the public domain.
I suggest Boring that the real reason you are upset is that in the past you have made a real mammary gland of your self and you didn't like it noticed.
Again, you don't get to decide what is and isn't inside information. Information in the public domain cannot be inside information.
Anyway, that should give you enough to go have one your frothing thrombos. In the meantime, I have to go and meet a man about a dog.
xx or should it be zz?