Member Info for HeadInTheSand

There's some serious thread archaeology...

If you're looking for further "Jesus wept" moments and can be bothered, see if you can dig up the Brokerman/Gold Bullion stuff and the deliberately false advice given about the need to attend the AGM (or was it an EGM? I forget...) held in the Channel Isles. That's a lulu...

I've said before and I'll say it again. The CTAG fiasco is definitely worthy of a miniseries - though it would be a tad hard to follow, given the multitude of wrong uns involved..

****** = rac ist.

one could claim that the epithet is sexist with some justification... but ******? seriously?

the tragi-comic problem with you, gom/1984/rr is that your view of even the most obvious aspects of reality is perma-distorted by having to pass through the lamentably twisted facets of your own personal prejudices.

"Karen"... a racial slur? Priceless.

It depends what the intent is.

I'm of like mind, sadly. I suspect that a civil action against Cloudtag (and especially a UK-based one), while very likely to be successful, would find an entirely empty cupboard regarding dispensable assets. As people have opined, ABH will have long made sure that any company monies are elsewhere - and I'm equally sure that he'll have precious few personal onshore assets within the UK.

Which is why encouraging a criminal case to be pursued, rather than a civil one, might prove to be the more appropriate option.

Sure, the criminal standard is harder to prove than the civil one (though one would have thought that with Amit's countless porkies, there was evidence aplenty).... and sure, even if successful, it's still unlikely to recover any compensation for defrauded PIs...

...but a criminal case is potentially also testable in other jurisdictions (cf. Dougb's reference to the amazing disappearing Chicago bank). And I'm beyond sure that everyone would like to see justice catch up with ABH one way or another.

I got your point, AIM. My own point (which I'm sure you'd agree with) is that by this stage nobody can possibly really need any more evidence that this is and has always been farcical and fraudulent nonsense.

"Does anybody else have doubts about ‘The buyer announcing the DaaP sale deal’?"

Yes, everyone (save those without braincells or related party agendas) has FAR more than doubts... and has had those for years. Amit shows an undeviating level of consistency, in that nothing he has ever assured, stated or promised has ever been in the slightest true. The by now long-proven fact that all he ever spouts is pure and unadulterated BS is the only thing that anyone will ever be able to take to the bank.

"...Due to unforeseen circumstances" is the phrase used in this latest pathetic fairytale excuse. Au contraire... with the greatest of ease, everyone here foresaw this latest in what will be an ongoing and never-ending series of delays.

(Well past) time for Mr Cotter to get busy and do what he can.

It remains a matter of passing interest as to why Grumpy Old Men (caps intended) like 1984/RedRoger (and his #1 fangirl too, for that matter) seem to be so continually intent on attempting to run interference for Captain BS ABH. It's laughably blatant smokescreening by trying to divert atttention onto largely irrelevant minutiae.

Needless to say, when actually cogent and tricky subjects are raised (such as the named but then rapidly deleted Chicago bank, the temporary specifying of SRS Acquiom, or the setting up of and attempted private fundraising for Neugen), they're all busily ignored by the distraction crew.

To my mind, DougB is close to hitting the nail on the head. Amit is clearly starting to feel the pressure from imminent legal moves and as such is kneejerking more than ever.

I'd have thought that the fractionally more important question was... has ABH told yet another massive porky, regardless of the length of extra time that this may have "bought" him?

The utter radio silence coming out from the now finished conference unsurprisingly seems to confirm that the answer is as usual a big fat yes.

Why he went for just a few more days of delay, although mildly interesting to speculate upon, is hardly the central crux here.

Feel free to come up with a plausible counter theory as to why he decided to kick the can yet further down the road for just a week..l

...and as if to prove the point, Redroger again deliberately misses it.

Amit's presumably main UK property has been on the market for a fair few months. It is not at all impossible that a buyer has by now made an accepted offer, that exchange of contracts has taken place and that Amit is merely waiting upon completion and transfer of funds.

As is blindingly obvious, the very recent BB newcomer RedRoger is indeed being deliberately obtuse and thus disingenuous on a number of fronts.

Yes, as pretty much anyone knows, being a director of a limited company offers said director protection against liability for company debts...

...but it's not a "get out of jail free" card in the least, when it comes to the issue of fraud or other malfeasance. In that case if proven, directors' personal assets can very much be up for grabs.

RedRoger, Amit's main UK residence has been on the market for a fair few months, so quite possibly.

A few of us here are of like mind, Upsidedownman. Buying enough time to dispose of his already on the market UK property and then hightailing it off to Tel Aviv.

A couple of points.

Re the alleged DaaP sale, it is categorically not about Amit announcing the buyer. He's already insisted that he's subject to an NDA (conveniently)... and what's more that the buyer will be announcing itself this week.

Probably a good thing if it happens (shyeah right), since Amit has shown himself to have a track record of naming real-world companies or individuals in statements that turn out to be utterly false. Hugh Risebrow joining, anyone? That Chicago bank holding the $50m of licence-related funds, anyone? As Thin Lizzy urged, don't believe a word - hence the promised DaaP announcement coming from the buyer, rather than Amit, would be a little more encouraging.

I'll again ask - what's holding Amit up from issuing any firm information about the distribution of funds from the licensing arrangement? He's clearly said that the two alleged deals - licensing and DaaP - are entirely separate and unrelated to each other - and he's also clearly said that there are two separate paying agents, one for each...

So (apart from the whole thing being the usual crock of Amit BS, as it always has been), what can possibly be stopping him issuing firm details on the licensing arrangement payout right now?

It's just laughable, isn't it?

I mean, forget the (literally) years of BS and can-kicking... just remember what the update of just a month ago said:-

"The Company is pleased to announce progress on recent developments regarding the licence transaction and the DaaP sale.

We confirm that both transactions will occur independently and concurrently. In acknowledgement of the previous statement made on 31st July regarding notifications from the Paying Agent, due to successful negotiations, licence notifications are no longer required before the DaaP sale.

There are two Paying Agents, one for the licence and the other appointed by the DaaP buyer. The Paying Agent for the licence will issue notifications for the funds it holds. The buyer’s Agent, with a reconciled share register, will notify shareholders regarding the distribution of funds for the DaaP sale after the buyer’s announcement.

Licence notifications and the DaaP sale announcement will take place before Friday 10th January 2025"

Soooo... just a month ago, Amit specifically stated that the alleged "licence transaction" and the alleged "DaaP sale" were two entirely separate and independent things. So why would a delay on any announcement by the alleged DaaP buyer cause any delay whatsoever to news of and notifications re the entirely separate and independent alleged licence transaction? The two allegedly even have separate paying agents - if Amit is to be believed (shyeah right), they could not be more discrete and unconnected.

That's always the trouble with habitual BS merchants - it becomes increasingly difficult to remember all the previous falsehoods spouted.

A cogent question, dougb. Both you and I have referred to the very recent appearance of Neugen before... it seems that this is an attempt to run the selfsame shtick, but using a new vehicle that isn't necessarily known by one and all (yet) to have the same square wheels and absolutely no engine.

This is very reminiscent of the death and instant phoenixing of 1980s double glazing companies. How boringly trite

...except what are the prices now enshrined in the gas offtake agreement?

Oh now that's particularly amusing. One of the multi-ID shills forgets which account he's posting from and screws up royally. Doesn't add much credibility to the assurances he's so keen for people to believe, does it?

This is the second time that this individual has provably been caught telling blatant porkies as well... the last time he claimed to have had contact from the paying agent, only for Amit to post an update a day or so later, saying that nobody had been contacted yet. Oops indeed.

Those with longer memories may recall the Brokerman/Gold Bullion multi-ID fiasco from a few years back, which was staggeringly similar due to the exact same mistake eventually being made by a shill (and quite possibly the very same shill).

The problem with undertaking a campaign of quite deliberate deception over a long period of time is that one has to have both an excellent memory of all the fibs one's told and a very careful eye for detail. This shill very obviously has neither

...and at 10:48 today, ANGS returns to form. It's like Old Faithful.

It's eminently clear that all of Ocelot's incessant hot air and pompom waving makes not the slightest bit of difference.