The next focusIR Investor Webinar takes places on 14th May with guest speakers from Blue Whale Growth Fund, Taseko Mines, Kavango Resources and CQS Natural Resources fund. Please register here.
Thanks SB,
I’ll take a look at that.
Hope all is well in Lancashire.
Harry
SB,
Good evening, would you care to divulge the specific oil field.
Harry
Lucky man 2,
Would you please advise on the share of costs breakdown given Rathlin have 66%. Thanks in advance ...
Harry
In my opinion, a correlation between the raises of UJO and RBD is erroneous as UJO have direct costs associated with the EWT at WN or further drill costs which may be necessary to harvest: RBD are not liable as they are a shareholder in Rathlin.
I see the raise as directly linked to further equity in Rathlin. I am not privy to the contract RBD have with Rathlin, however, it would not surprise if the astute S&S have a condition which prevents dilution of their interest thereby disallowing a raise by Rathlin . Solely my opinion.
Harry
“growing income stream” is an interesting statement.
Where is the update on California?
I agree an IPO of Raithlin is the consonant route to establish shareholder value.
Harry
AJ, You have a valid question. S&S need to manage expectations. Harry
https://mobile.twitter.com/alexios1201/status/1133797274201612288?prefetchtimestamp=1559160898753
Compliments to Alexios on the UJO board.
Harry
imminent 6 month report due to Investors in whatever fund RBD is a constituent part- that constituent is negative 20% +. I feel sure their former colleagues will be in the faces of S&S seeking explanation. Point of interest, in the “Big Short” one can see what happens when Investors and the team are down 11% in a fund. Worth a watch. The RNS this week was not the important one- flow rates and cash flows from California required. Consequently, today’s trading is a mirror image of how the market reacts where the business plan has not illustrated results based on the model. S&S need to deliver. Harry
Jack, An excellent, objective and factual post..
5/9/2018 4.8mm raised @ 85: 3mm from cornerstone M&G. Clearly, the business plan presented to the II’s has not materialised to date: they are down in excess of 20%. I feel sure there is contact between the BOD and M&G and, explanation being sought. The revised BP would be welcomed by all including this PI. I continue to add at these levels. Harry
Trytryagain A valid point. Harry
Invested £3mm @ 85p which is perhaps the strongest indication that S&S’s grand plan was a current SP of £1. In fairness, it was not reasonably foreseeable that an impecunious investment fund would upset the applecart. The Colter drill produced a commercial result which in the fullness of time will be conveyed. The fundamentals are sound (perhaps 750k spent on a sidetrack was naive) and I am taking advantage of current weakness. Harry
Fergus, Apologies, signed in on The Outlaw’s Desk Top in Beijing. Mobile now charged@ 02:30. Harry
Ying Tong Always illustrative and objectively balanced posts are appreciated. My understanding is funding will be from “Existing cash balances and future cash generation...” Extrapolated from the projection study independently commissioned. That said, they are merely projections and the future cash calls seem, on the face, onerous. I guess the Q3 fs will make interesting reading. Harry
SB I agree with the substantive post. However, why would MF have a hope of inclusion in the Q3 fs when they state: “... delay is due to the final stage of the merger of shares of Oleo e Gas Participoconoes SA by Dommo Energia SA ... the last step of judicial reorganisation of both parties and the signing of a New Charter Agreement for FPSO OSX-3 ... Simon’s tweet 26/11 and the purported later assertions to selected SH’s were “Aloadai”. Harry
Factual and unequivocal summary of the state of play offshoreenergytoday.com Harry
In Whitehall, especially the dining room is a venue well chosen by Minty: it’s not a forum where “ blazing guns” would be accepted or tolerated. More a venue consonant with acquiescence, cajolery and repartee especially where one’s position is overloaded. The current overriding question is when will the next Placing be announced where there is no revenue? Harry
Ying Tong, If it’s the China facility I have researched, the owners have been wise in partial reimbursement by way of insurance covering its cancellation from previous deployment. However, to my knowledge, the costly tech remains incomplete. 200 year anniversary of Peterloo in 2019, perhaps NUOG might be assuaged to represent SH interests to deflect what may be impeachment. Harry
Ying Tong, Many thanks. The balance seems to be the entanglement. Harry
Ying Tong, We have on “insider authority “ that the strategy is purchase of the OGX-3 FPSO to gain a 36% approx equity in the TB field. My interpretation of the Court’s Judgment is that this awarded on re- delivery only. Are the assignment rights simply awarded to the assignee. Harry