Member Info for harpmandoodle

Seeing as they did not publish the annual results today, my feel is that we get a complete package document this week.

results should be published 6th June if it goes as last year.It must be either the 'big day' or they will have some other excuse.

525934 @ 0.0923

I'm close to breakeven too. Hope it's a good sign for 2017.

Anyone know anything?

Corporate Update, NOT RNS. That came from RRR only. Efficient reporting, but should have an RNS from NCT re: Shoat's Creek.

RNS out late. http://www.investegate.co.uk/northcote-energy-ltd--nct-/prn/shoats-creek-production-update/20160714090000P4C6B/

That's good, at least a part of the company is still functioning.

Does the EGM result need an RNS given it has delisted?

As for the vote, it was quite close, but not enough for my few unused votes to make a difference! 8.9mill to 7.7mill.

Well thanks for making the effort to attend. I also trust the vitriol will cease and the new BoD will be successful. Of course, now they will find out just wheret the funds are in the company and whether they have a cashflow to go on with. They may get hit with large fees as well from advisers and the departing board members too. I guess the £1million investment is no longer up for grabs, if what the old BoD told us last week is anything to go by. Then again, you never know in business, things hit you when you are least expecting them.

So do we know who the corporate was that voted against the board? Did they vote themselves off?

Last figure I have is 64,541,810 so your group represents about 9% of the total. How many will vote can only be known Tuesday. I would think the corporates will at least abstain, but more likely vote against the resolutions.

There were 4 at the meeting last week not 3. Did you'all make the effort to get off your arses and find out? No of course not.

What if the current creditors, and there will be creditors in any company listed or private, wind the company up for unpaid invoices? Then where's your company to have a new BoD. it would be out of your hands and into the administrators. I think you should all give serious consideration to delaying your intended votes.The fact that Drummond has resigned is interesting, but it will not stop the largest creditor applying for a winding up should they feel the best value to them is to do so. Conversely, one director is I believe an FCA, so they would know their way around the workings of companies. Will that director risk their credibility on a 'going concern' that is no such thing? Only time will tell I guess.

Thanks Toffee, you have saved me time responding to the 'Muppets'. Everyone has a decision to make on which way to vote. I stick to the gut feel of giving it a go. Here's a fact already set out below: Software needs a developer. It ain't going to work without one. Draw your own conclusions. The intellectual property rights of any piece of software sits in someone's grey matter. They have feet too.

Well the vitriol here is as expected. I went to the meeting as a very small shareholder. The reason it has taken me this long is because at my age I need 24 hours to recover from visiting the filthy City of London! Ordinarily I would not have gone, as the amount of paper loss is about what I could earn in a few minutes had I beeen still working, however I was in London and the times suited me between appointments. My other motive was that I did not understand what the company was about till yesterday. As a former (yes I was the old git there) IT specialist on top flight market data systems, I am interested in the app doing well and making me a buck or two. By the way I was not a plant by the BoD and taker offence at any suggestion that it may have been the case. I didn't suspect any of the attendees of being in that position either. We questioned the board on the history of the company and the future for it and the app. There seems to be these two threads to the company. App development and as an investment company. It is hard luck I think, that caused AIM to have it delisted for not having the correct investment strategy. There's nothing to be done about that now, but build it up again. I can't make any statements about the two members of the BoD that attended other than they seem to be the typical directors of small companies trying to make a go of a particular business. Having run several businesses myself, I identified several similarities with my former small companies and have empathy with what they are trying to achieve. Could there be a way forward? We discussed what the results of a vote next week would mean, but no decisions were made. I suggested co-opting a shareholders member to the board, but no decision was made either way. The shareholders' group representative said they had discussed this before, but again no decision was made then either. I decided to not vote against them, but as my investment is tiny, it would make no odds either way. My decision is based on my gut feel only and my empathy towards small company directors. I think they have made some mistakes in the past, but we all do that from time to time. I see a good future for an app of the nature of the one discussed. It remains the best part of the business from a technologist's viewpoint. Whether it is what makes the company in the future is anybody's guess. I came away with the notion that the BoD need four weeks to put forward a deal with the investor via a circular, etc., and that the vote next week gets in the way of that. I have to say, if it was one of my companies, I would feel pretty ****ed off to, but that's life in a company with multiple shareholders. What the shareholders have to do is make a judgement based on the known circumstances. There must be some substantial corporate shareholders in this one, so the outcome for next week is not guaranteed either way. Good luck to the BoD and to the shareholders group in their endeavours.

ow it's 132628.L

You probably need to have the certificated share to call an EGM. You are correct, you can vote at the EGM without the certificate by getting the letter from your broker..