RE: Times article8 Jun 2024 17:59
Having read the article, I can only assume shareholders stay due to Stockholme syndrome. If you've lost money here there's far better investments out there than THG for future returns.
Comment about Dogs shows his disdain for and view of the 35% of free float.
Don't be surprised if there's a major political donation from THG of your money...it's already authorised via vote.
There's actually inaccuracies in the article. It makes out it's still a growth company but as noted revenues overall are flat at best. You can't cling onto a tiny bit of growth in beauty, one division, and claim it's a growth company.
There is no interest in delivering Kelso or any other shareholders any value back. Absolutely crystal clear.