Member Info for haggismchaggis1

Or a Royal Mail (not a Royal Male, ladies!)

Look at the Hiiroc RNS. Methane to Hydrogen to AFC Fuel Cells with zero carbon emissions.

Needs an ignition source.

."According to the investigation, not all of the hydrogen gas was purged from the generator and was ignited by a fan or work light Rogers used as part of performing maintenance."

https://www.wect.com/story/14446058/investigation-sutton-plant-explosion-caused-by-hydrogen/

The difference I think is that the MM's can see which MM made the trade and what type of trade it is. You can't force your trade to comply.

And there we see after the 600 trade the ASK has been walked down. It might just be coincidence, who knows!

A few people have mentioned the small trades and the notion that they might be code being signaled between market makers, dealers, etc.

I just dug this up, as I just saw the price move down on a 600 trade.

Make of it what you will. Anyone that's an MM, dealer etc will no doubt deny it, but that doesn't mean it isn't happening between syndicated groups of MM's, dealers etc. The FOREX rigging is a prime example that these shenanigans do happen.

1. 100 - I need Shares.
2. 200 - I need Shares badly but do not take the stock down.
3. 300 - Take (or I am taking) the stock down at least 30% so I can load shares.
4. 400 - Keep trading it sideways.
5. 500 - Gap the stock. Gap can be up or down, depending on direction of 500 signal.
6. 505 - I am short on shares
7. 600 - Apply resistance at the ASK to keep the price from increasing.
8. 700 - Move the price up.
9. 777 - Also recognized as a signal to move the price up.
10. 800 - Prepare for an increase in trading volume.
11. 900 - Allow the stock to float and trade freely.
12. 911 - Pending News/Press Release On The Way
13. 1000 - Don't let it run
14. 2100 - Let it run

http://www.pennystockdream.com/Market-Maker-Signals

Skinny boy,

What logic are you using to base that on?

People have been queuing for the EV Charger for over a year.....

Only some sites will 'choose' Ammonia.

It's the cost of the Ammonia cracker that makes the big difference, not the supply of a cylinder or tank of fuel, which requires a lorry either way.

Also the size of the Ammonia cracker will increase the footprint of the system by another container, so it's more likely to be chosen for bug sites with a big EV Charger.

My post below from Monday. I'd say I was definitely on the money with "may have just wanted to see the beast in the flesh before signing on the dotted line." bearing in mind the CEO Blog post today states "Several prospective customers travelled to Scotland especially to meet AFC Energy and witness the operation of our EV charger in real time.".

AFC have a huge number of sales leads, but will be focussing on getting the easiest (say one small charger for a small fleet, where it only needs MD sign off) signed off ASAP, to get the workload down.

So for me, a sale could be signed off any day now.
__________

Except that some customers were lining up for the EV Charger over a year ago, that's the reason AFC designed and built it. Those customers would have been kept appraised of the situation at every step, and may have just wanted to see the beast in the flesh before signing on the dotted line.

Also, some smaller fleet owners will have far less paperwork and no accounting hoops to jump through, with basically just the MD or CEO empowered to sign off a deal at very short notice.

And you have those like Welcome Break and Roadchef crying out for this solution

Petrol and diesel tanks need a vent in case of pressure build up in hot weather, the vent is also then a risk because the vapour escaping when it's hot could be ignited.

Hydrogen and Ammonia don't have any vent.

https://www.intechopen.com/books/hydrogen-energy-challenges-and-perspectives/ammonia-as-a-hydrogen-source-for-fuel-cells-a-review

https://www.intechopen.com/books/hydrogen-energy-challenges-and-perspectives/ammonia-as-a-hydrogen-source-for-fuel-cells-a-review

Muscorum,

It's primarily advertised as a green Hydrogen system with zero emissions.

The Ammonia advantages are balanced out by the need to pay for and maintain an Ammonia cracker.

Because it's very easy to transport and handle, it's available in an existing global supply chain including via a couple of pipelines, it's got high density of Hydrogen without compression, it's cheap but probably no cheaper than cheap Hydrogen, because that's what's in it.

Nobody needs an Ammonia based system, they can just use Hydrogen or Green Hydrogen. The bigger the system the bigger the fuel tank, whether that is a tank of compressed Hydrogen or a tank of Ammonia makes no difference in the off-grid situations were talking about.

Just had a look and there's loads available on the web, all start at 1 NM3/hour.

Any size fuel cell can run on Hydrogen from Ammonia.

The real factor that dictates the size of the fuel cell system in that scenario is the minimum size of available Ammonia cracker. But even then, with Hydrogen storage it wouldn't matter.

"Recently concluded trials have shown that AFC's proprietary fuel cell system can use "off the shelf" ammonia cracking technology, with little difference in performance compared to hydrogen sourced from industrial plants."

https://www.proactiveinvestors.co.uk/companies/news/211982/afc-energy-lays-out-string-of-markers-for-hydrogen-fuel-cells-211982.html

Thanks Mucksy!

All those posts yesterday about ROLEC, I said they had to still be in!

Now can they get the EV Charger on their website?, or are AFC already too overwhelmed with potential orders, that Polar have been asked to hold off for a bit, to give AFC time to 'consolidate'?

He/they seem to like the word! Might be more useful to us if he/they chose words that are not so ambiguous!