Member Info for haggismchaggis1

Excellent! Thanks for proving the scientific analysis correct! Your cognitive bias is working perfectly!

EV's are cheaper to own than petrol or diesel when you look at TCO (Total Cost of Ownership). In other words, if you buy an EV today, in a few years you will have saved so much that the total cost of owning and running that EV will be less than if you had bought a petrol or diesel.

Other Fuel Cell manufacturers:

BLDP have been £9.36Bn MCap
FCEL have been £7.7Bn
BE have been £6.68Bn
PLUG have been £32.33Bn

For AFC to be £10 per share it would just need a MCap of £7.35Bn, which based upon the above is clearly achievable.

Don't listen to the con men's baseless drivel, look at the FACTS!!

I just checked and can see the buyer of 50k chunks has so far bough 5 more 50k chunks today. Keep it up I say!

"Now that the main financial and technological barriers have been removed (more affordable purchase prices, financial incentives, denser network of charging stations), what factors are still blocking widespread adoption of this mode of transportation? A large part of the answer lies in the cognitive biases and shortcuts of car drivers."

“Until now, initiatives related to the energy transition generally focused on the technological and financial barriers to their realization. Psychological factors have been given very little consideration. However, many studies show that individuals do not automatically adopt the behaviors most beneficial for themselves or society, often due to a lack of access to complete information”, explains Mario Herberz, first author of the study and researcher at the Consumer Decision and Sustainable Behavior Laboratory of the Department of Psychology at the Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences of the UNIGE.

“We observed that the participants systematically underestimated the compatibility of electric battery capacities available on the current market with their real needs,” says Tobias Brosch, director of the Consumer Decision and Sustainable Behavior Laboratory and last author of the research.

In other words, consumers wrongly believe that the autonomy of current batteries is not sufficient to cover their daily journeys. This underestimation is substantial, the researchers estimating it at around 30%.

https://www.eurasiareview.com/20052022-cognitive-bias-is-blocking-rise-of-electric-cars/

Time to accept that you are wrong and buy the EV you need, not the fossil fuel burner that you clearly do not need.

(cue the typical BS responses that just prove the above scientific analysis is correct!!)

"Now that the main financial and technological barriers have been removed (more affordable purchase prices, financial incentives, denser network of charging stations), what factors are still blocking widespread adoption of this mode of transportation? A large part of the answer lies in the cognitive biases and shortcuts of car drivers."

“Until now, initiatives related to the energy transition generally focused on the technological and financial barriers to their realization. Psychological factors have been given very little consideration. However, many studies show that individuals do not automatically adopt the behaviors most beneficial for themselves or society, often due to a lack of access to complete information”, explains Mario Herberz, first author of the study and researcher at the Consumer Decision and Sustainable Behavior Laboratory of the Department of Psychology at the Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences of the UNIGE.

“We observed that the participants systematically underestimated the compatibility of electric battery capacities available on the current market with their real needs,” says Tobias Brosch, director of the Consumer Decision and Sustainable Behavior Laboratory and last author of the research.

In other words, consumers wrongly believe that the autonomy of current batteries is not sufficient to cover their daily journeys. This underestimation is substantial, the researchers estimating it at around 30%.

https://www.eurasiareview.com/20052022-cognitive-bias-is-blocking-rise-of-electric-cars/

Time to accept that you are wrong and buy the EV you need, not the fossil fuel burner that you clearly do not need.

(cue the typical BS responses that just prove the above scientific analysis is correct!!)

Well said Jimmy, I concur, I absolutely concur!!

Well at least we had a buyer yesterday of 50,000 blocks, and earlier today. So someone with a decent pot is happy to accumulate at these lows.

Brettington,

I am sticking to facts. What I posted is fact.

The con men will use anything as an excuse to post more garbage, so it doesn't make any difference if we post fact, fiction, opinion, or anything else.

Aldebaran,

Ignore Dessert Wolf, he's a moronic con man that has been talking down AFC with his mate GarMOAN for years. They use baseless claims to argue against any positive views, and post fake claims just to get a reaction and fill this board with garbage.

Multi-bn, simple.

Just look at the multi-bn MCap's already achieved by companies in the same sector in just a few years of selling, such as PLUG (went to $32Bn last year), FCEL, BLDP, BE (Bloom Energy), CWR and ITM.

I have always had a target of £10 per share (for the 13 years that I've held the stock), however long it takes, because I know it's possible if AFC are successful, and I wait for that success.

Aldebaran,

Read the RNS since at least last year's final results. No point asking very basic questions about valuation until you understand the company and what it is doing, you might as well just pluck numbers from the air, like many on here do because it suits their trading position.

Aldebaran,

Read the RNS since at least last year's final results. No point asking very basic questions about valuation until you understand the company and what it is doing, you might as well just pluck numbers from the air, like many on here do because it suits their trading position.

I would not write off this year yet, because at some point all the big money will go bargain hunting, and there are a lot of tasty bargains to be had, especially in the areas of clean energy such as green Hydrogen, Fuel Cells, Solar, Wind Turbines, etc. AFC is noe of those bargains.

Be fearful when others are greedy, be greedy when others are fearful. Warren Buffett.

I

https://www.proactiveinvestors.co.uk/companies/news/976243/afc-energy-to-begin-system-deployments-with-several-partners-in-2022-broker-976243.html

Thuis dog share is no more down than 90% of the other stock you could have your money sat in, so don't talk so much s h I t e.

And this dog share is now BLUE, because clearly there is huge support below this level, so the con men shorting scum can't force it lower for long with that huge support pushing it back up.

Cheekboy2,

Yeah, even hicon, or should that now be Hi Con, has gone to the dark side too now, judging by his threads and posts from today. Subtle bashing, but bashing nonetheless.

Hico, have you turned into a basher as well, because from the last few threads you've created it certainly looks like it to me.

You know full well what has been written in recent RNS about Mace and how things are progressing with them, yet you choose to start another 'typical basher' thread about sales, when you must already know the answer to that. Clearly it's time for you to go on filter with the rest of the con men.

I'm pretty sure Zak knows that to make chart moves happen you need meaningful volume.

So far today we have 7,155,020 shares traded of approx 4,211,000,000 shares in issue, so around 0.17% of the stock traded so far today.

Sometimes I wonder if Zak is being paid to talk up stocks to help placees make a quick profit.

Charting aside, AEX to me is clearly worth a lot more for the gas resources it owns, and the $35m carry to production of those resources. But we still need meaningful volume of buying to get that rerate and for it to stick. Zak is more likely to cause a short term spike, so as a long term holder I'd rather have the former.

Success with projects will make this fly, we don't need hype. That is what the BoD would tell you, if they were allowed.