Member Info for gwilliams71

when Steven Sanderson spoke to Zak Mir last month he expressly and expilicityly stated that tankers were being taken to hamble and the oil sold at market rates. Something you and your hideous ilk have questioned in the past Scandic (that oil could be sold from EWT).

Waste is tanken in waste tankers, with different hazchem plates. As we have seen the tankers have oil hazchem plates and therefore will be continuing to carry this oil to market. To suggest otherwise is even by your standards low and in the extreme a blatent lie. You cannot handle seeing this produce after you have given so much stick to a BOD who wouldn't be abloe to do it. You can't handle the share price, it's not made you rich and you're lashing out at others for your own shocking investment choices. See an IFA - get a cash ISA or some post office bonds, failing that a piggy bank.

oil coming out daily. Fact

Crikey if you think its where it is simply because the ceo doesnt give you an rns every day you're lost.

Read the list of rns in the last six months. What do you want a daily roundup???

Scandic you say, and i quote "No wonder Bourgues ran a miles when they realised who they were on bed with." Are you seriously suggesting a company of their stature really bought shares to the value they did, without a level of due diligence?? Really??? You seriously expect people to listen to you when you burp up such up educated tripe??? What did they buy at?? What did they.sell.at??? In what volume and what PROFIT??? You are a clueless i individual. They bought lower than they sold. In huge quantities. The converse trading plan is to buy high and whinge when you don't get rich overnight, i.e. YOU!! Always someone else's fault isnt ir.. Do shut up or cone up with something worth listening to. (Que all sorts of biblical insults involving disciples)....

Stuart someone was recently saying that it wasnt possible to sell oil from ewt to market at market price. That was a load of cobblers too

scandic, that is what you have been banging on about for years; that ss needed to up the pr on this company. Hes done that after a string of positive rns and you are now having a go at him for that. Basically you're either so damaged by your buy in price and so incandescent with anger that you didnt make a profit yet, or you're simply trying to push your narrative in the vein attempt at a lower entry point Youve accused him of lying, now his company are pumping oil and youve moved the goal posts Basically you dont have what yiu want and can't wait. That is a shame, but really no one made you buy the shares. Tell me, what was it that caused you to buy in the first place?

still playing the put upon victim then Scandic I see, haven't sold up, haven't moved on, still blaming someone else for your own investment decisions?

Number of shares has nothing to do with market cap. Read his comment again and look at their mcap and compare it to ukog. He point and i believe a very valuable one, is that certainly with sxx, theyre still yeaes from production and revenue. It is however a huge deposit and im in no way knocking them. But shares in circ wasnt the point, it was marcap. If ukog mrcap was 1 billion for example the share price wouls be roughly 20p. Purely as an example

You have been asking for publicity for a long time. Good rns, good pr, and youre still negative. Very transparent.

Agreed, but I have a bit of rope I'm willing to give him to use as he'/she chooses

Higgy, that's an interesting comment. Would you like to enlarge upon it and tell us exactly why you think that is the case, do you have some knowledge we don't? Maybe it was an inuendo? Whichever I would be really keen to hear why you think this is the case. To make a statement such as that without some backup doesn't really carry much weight

Surrey cc have already granted a production licence for the other weald player so there is precedence. It wont take 2 years.

Scandic poor chap, it would appear you're never correct. Best find yourself an ifa.

Baz, that's quite an immature comment when a company is deep into a project to prove up the weald oil play. What do you mean about not caring about shareholders? No dividend? No rise in price to your sell point?

Look at the range of this share in the last 12 months. If one wanted to trade this share and make big returns it has been great. If one is in this for the long term, then they can wait for the expected news in due course. If they don't and want neither then I suggest to them maybe get out (of course Imo blah blah).

A few years ago the CEO was branded a liar, even on a BBC documentary as there wasn't so much as an egg cup of recoverable oil down there. Now it's coming out and they're working on the very well documented goals (refer to RNS list), it's a new bunch of insults thrown at them.

As Jack Welsh said ...Shareholder value is a result, not a strategy . . . Your main constituencies are your employees, your customers and your products.

i.e. - If they prove this up and get on with the job with a postivie outcome, shareholder value will come.

could ukog have part of that with the funds from the ewt oil sold?

"silent mode?? The last RNS was 8 days ago, detailing the portland as commercial. The unexpected bonus of oil, that is there and commercial. How is that 'Silent'??

You should try harder, like...they found the boggey man down there....black plague still living under HH or some other tripe.

If you're so against ukog, why do 69u continue to post here?

They have a long history of doubting this project, starting with Critchlow who was clearly wrong. Google it

Spot on kempey, precident has been set.

The likes of scandic are doing it for him instead