Member Info for gwilliams316

An update on accounts should be a priority. Its hardly a multi billion dollar business with thousands upon tousands of transactions to reconcile.

Bank statments rns was released at the end of Oct.

It cant take this long to do a small company set of accounts surely.

The mcap simply doesnt reflect a company with a prospect with license approval and placing out the way to fund. Dyor.

Well the license is in place and now our part of the funds so hopefully its all lining up nicely. Dyor.

Investing is a risky business. If the drill doesnt happen then were in trouble, however anyone in at the current share price and we have drilling news will be rewarded. Dyor. Gla

I dont have an issue if the funds are being used to drill. Anyone holding here over the next couple of months will be rewarded in my opinion.

Yes would be great to hear from the new CEO and get an update on the accounts. Whats everyones thoughts on having these ready for the AGM??? I would hope to see them before hand.

Ssccss yes makes you wonder doesnt it. It may just be to approve the BOD or maybe the new shares to be issued.

Who knows???

On the other hand chinese state involvement will mean block on the implementation into most western countries imo.

In my opinio taking info as gospel from China is not advised and needs review. Theres a chance we will hear inaccuracy in the costs data, State backing, staff costs etc etc

Id like to see a vision and statement from Tom and Lunn and let us decide who appears best placed. Theres obviously an issue between them.

The AGM would have been perfect for this. Vote on it and move foward.

All

Our company presently has been suspended for 6 months.

We have a Chairman with next to no shares in PPP not voted in apparently refusing to allow shareholder resolutions. On top of that be holds a £4m loan against us which potentially is a huge conflict of interest.

This tic for tac is not helpful. There is serious debate needed about the pros and cons of what is going on and shareholders need as much information as possible to vote what could be a pivotal AGM.

Please, whether you support Lunn or Evans stop with the name calling and abuse of each other and share concerns in a constructive way.

Rob i hope theres no orivate information on this letter youve seen mate. Could be illegal to share without permission.

Zag

But thats a decison for shareholders is my point.

There was resolution to remove lunn.

I just dont understand those celebrating the company not engaging with shareholders.

Sorry seen last post. 👍

So youve seen the letter or not mate. Sorry to be so direct. Youve either seen it or you havent.

A request to add resolutions to the agm was sent by a group of shareholders. Support was close to 20m shares on the email.

My point is whilst we may agree of disagree on directors etc. Surely the shareholders as a collective should be able to vote as such.

If there is support for them great thats how it works if theres not enough suport thats also great.

But to not give the option is not a good optic in my opinion. Its makes my question why a Chairman who should have a duty to shareholders feels the need to reject the resolutions.

I supported the resolutions being put to a vote btw for clarity.

Rob have you seen the letter mate??

Honestly.

Those cheering a Chairman blocking shareholder engagement. Why not allow the votes on all resolutions from PPP and shareholders.

What is gained by doing so that is the question.

If theres no support the resolutions fail anyway.

Regardless of the pump and dump crew. This appears to be undervalued still. So i still think there is a good chance of upside here. Dyor. Gla

Traders trade its what they do. I hope im not wrong but i think this is way undervalued and has to reflect its investments at some point. GLA