Member Info for guzzler1962

Apologies, target revenue is approximately $35M over 5 years not $40M.

Momo

Approximately 100 million shares will be added next month.
Not at this level but the 3 month average, so somewhere between current price (or lower) and 0.18p.

We have 5 NFT contracts over a 5 year period.
The target revenue is $40M.
That's $8M per year.
Break it down even further, and after converting to Sterling its £533K per month.
Then add to that our affiliate revenue.
£700K per month is what we should be expecting.
This does not include the Mex Fed 3 year contract, so we could argue our revenue should be even higher.
It's early days but have we proved to the Market we can provide enough drops to create the revenue?
If we take on more contracts, does that make the task even more difficult?
Should we be adding more shares to the register at this low price?
We need to prove we can handle what we have, a good starting point would be an Atlante Champions drop before the new season.
It's not too much to ask is it?

City

What you would prefer me to do is follow your example and ramp this stock.
You would have preferred me to defend Epstein in March when he hamstrung us.
You would have preferred me to forget the ridiculous Gfin debacle.
You would preferred me to state ridiculous values for our contracts rather than quote non guaranteed target.
You would have preferred me to defend the last placing and the ongoing dilution to fund contracts.
You would prefer me not to highlight that there needs to be multiple NFT drops per month.
You would prefer I don't question the reason we are at an all time low.
None of those things are going to happen.
It's impossible to defend the actions of the BOD over the last 10 months and its impossible to ramp this stock.

City

When you learn to read RNSs then perhaps you can claim I'm embarrassing myself.
How many times have I had to correct you now?

On Thursday a situation came to light that questioned the involvement of S&MI Ltd.
It was serious enough for a shareholder to personally visit our CEO and get Scoffham on the phone.
Apparently the error was corrected.
However, the situation served as a springboard for further scrutiny.
MOS announced it acquired LiveScores/Quanta for £125K of shares with a further possible £75K.
For some reason, this figure is being disputed.
Regardless of the figure MOS owns the underlying platform engine, domains and IP of LiveScores since February.
In August S&MI Ltd is founded with Scoffham as a Director.
A new website is launched that is identical to LiveScores.
It's not a knock off, or a cheap copycat. It's exactly the same.
Questioning it is met with the usual abuse.
But I find it very strange that someone can set up identical content to ours, especially when that someone is the fella we bought the content off in the first place.

Toffeman

Can you tell me what date MOS acquired LiveScores?
The monetary value and number of shares awarded to Scoffham?
The date Scoffham launched an identical website with identical content to LiveScores?

Sophie

Just remember, when you posed the question regarding the need for funding, City said there wasn't one.
The line was, if in doubt contact the BOD.
We all know how that plays out.

Taken from the RNS

The consideration for the acquisition is £125,000 to be paid in shares, which are subject to a minimum 12 month lockup, and up to £75,000 in shares in three equal further tranches based on revenue derived from specific existing contracts over the next 12 months

Sophie

I think roley is his bestie.
He rushed round to see him on Friday to discuss a bit of gossip on Advfn.
Apparently everything is in order.

Toffeman

You've been provided with links to LiveScores Apps and Sportslockercom.
You will find, if you can be bothered to look, reference to S&MI Ltd on all three sites.
I've also provided a link showing that Tim Scoffham is a Director of SM&I Ltd.
He is a MOS shareholder since we gifted him £200K worth of shares for his content.
I also provided the RNS showing that too.
The concern is, that Sportslockercom was created after we acquired his content and he has used it to set up a platform independent of MOS.

So LiveScores and Sportslockercom, two identical platforms created by Scoffham can operate in the same territory?
MOS and its shareholders benefit from LiveScores revenue.
Scoffham with his gifted £200K worth of MOS shares benefits from LiveScores and Sportslockercom.
Sounds about right I suppose.

Good question Hepseal,

Sportslockercom can't operate in LiveScores territory.
Does that mean LiveScores can't operate in Sportslockercom territory?
Has Scoffham created competition for MOS even though we gifted him a sh#t load of shares?

The consideration for the acquisition is £125,000 to be paid in shares, which are subject to a minimum 12 month lockup, and up to £75,000 in shares in three equal further tranches based on revenue derived from specific existing contracts over the next 12 months.

But it is there.
Scoffham has launched a website identical to LiveScores

https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/officers/kCTP23NRbgGZm253QNKkMtQjUgc/appointments

So just to clarify.
A new website is founded.
It's identical to LiveScores.
LiveScores generates revenue for MOS.
Sportslockercom generates revenue for......?
A Director of Sportslockercom is Tim Scoffham who developed LiveScores.
We have given £200K worth of shares to Scoffham for exclusive use of LiveScores.

Do we get revenue from sportslockercom?

I thought we owned the content?

Who is it?