Member Info for guzzler1962

Now the free drop has ended, does anyone know how many were claimed?
Discord group closing in on 1100 members currently.

Roley

You simply haven't grasped it have you?
I'm giving you, and others, an opportunity to refute the negatives.
An opportunity to respond with positives that outshine the negatives and promote the good stuff.
Apart from 6 million Instagram views as a positive (think it was me that pointed out discord numbers were up) there has been nothing.
Sadly, those 6 million views, just like Gfin and their viewers, won't raise the Mcap.
We need solid news with solid figures.
I think that's the least we deserve since the BOD took the decision 4 months ago to conduct a 33% discounted placing to ensure further contracts to boost our revenue figures.

Shouldn't be in a situation where investors are constantly emailing the BOD.
That applies to all stocks.
Anyone looking to take a position should start their research by reading RNSs.
If someone did that today they would be under the impression that MOS invested £250K in Gfin at 1.25p and that investment was a poor decision.
Would that make them think twice?
Can a potential new investor work out the current Mcap?
The shares in issue should have been updated by now.
It's not the duty of Shareholders to chase this stuff, it should be in the public domain via official RNSs.

Has anyone else noticed that nobody has been able to counter the negative posts?
It's a perfect platform to highlight the investment case for MOS.
And nobody is able to do seize the opportunity.
Petty name calling and weak excuses for the low SP have become the main defence of the current situation.
We are half way through the first Quarter of the year and I don't understand why investors are forced to contact the BOD directly to find out what the situation is regarding number of shares in issue and the Gfin situation.
Lack of transparency is a sentiment killer on AIM but our BOD and large shareholders appear to be totally oblivious to the situation.

Come Roley

Where's your imaginary AGM notes you promised?

Toffeman

There was a time when 75% of my PF was MOS.
Since i first bought in 2021 I've been a holder, and I still hold today.
I know you can't get your head around a shareholder that doesn't ramp to high heavens and calls out bullsh#t, but you're stuck with me.
Holding clearly was a mistake, but don't fret, scaling out is the plan.
Not fully of course, after all this is a £100M Mcap company in the making.

There's a reason this is sitting just above all time lows.
Remember when the World Cup was going to bring in a load of revenue?
Then remember the focus changing to the clubs, a new season and multiple drops in January?
Or perhaps all those contracts between $5M and $25M?
These aren't things that I've said, these are things the rampers have said.
And now?
Nothing goes up in a straight line, drops not designed to sell out, haven't got started yet, wait a couple of months.
Jam tomorrow garbage.
6 weeks left of Burtons 24 week period. Let's see if we can get back to placing price before the jury returns it's verdict.

Toffeman

Try this.
There is a minimum target to be reached that guarantees revenue.
What is it?
How do we achieve it?
What happens if we don't achieve it?

The floor is open to our biggest shareholder.
An ideal opportunity to demonstrate how MOS makes big money from these contracts.
If the Pumas contract is too difficult to explain why not use the Mex Fed contract.
I've been reliably informed by City that Epstein has stated the target is in excess of $14M.
Over 3 years.
I'm sure everyone, regardless of their viewpoint, would like to know the answer to that.
(watch this space doesn't count)

Toffeman

I suggest you relisten to the last 2 podcasts.
The first, Epstein stated that 3 contracts were "worth" $30M.
The target is actually $16M.
The latest podcast he made the same mistake before correcting himself.
So the question is simple.
Given that the CEO believes these contracts are worth high value, how will that be achieved?

Would love you to explain how a revenue target of $14M (to MOS)over 5 years from the Pumas contract will be achieved.

Momo

I'd give up guessing games if I was you.
You're clearly rubbish at them.

Probably a Tr1 showing percentage holding maintained.

Bottom could be in now

Not once in weeks, if not months can you counter the negatives that have resulted in shareholder value destruction.
Not once!
This bulls##t you spout that you know better is just that, bulls##t.
And people are beginning to cotton on to your nonsense.

Take a step back and open your eyes lectures our top ramper.
The irony is strong.
The share price has tanked 77% in 12 months.
Even further if you consider this hit 0.7p off the back of Epsteins £100M Mcap affiliate revenue ramp.
How much cash have we got left and how much did we have left the last time they hamstrung us?

3 sold out drops?
Shall we debate?
Pumas. Correct price point, Correct numbers issued.
Mex Fed. Whitelist. Correct price point Correct numbers issued.
Other Mex Fed drops failed.
Necaxa, Atlante premium price point for limited editions. Failed.
Lopez. 5 hospitality packages sold for a total of £8300.
Exciting times.

No way will this BOD admit to slipping out inside info at the AGM.
At least Roley had the good sense to step away and not print his notes.

Rowley

Same challenge to you.
Refute my claims if you can.

But for those with short memories, here's a little reminder.
October 5th SP 0.27p
October 6th SP 0.19p
October 6th Burton told us to judge their decision to raise to fund NFT contracts in 24 weeks time.
We are at week 18.
SP 0.11p