Member Info for guzzler1962

Now that's interesting.
Bit late for me to listen tonight but will listen in the morning.
Should put to bed whether DW said 100/200 bagger or not which some here are now dismissing as a myth.
Many thanks flexmw for posting.

Desmond, 18th October 2016. Significant conventional potential. SP dropped. Makes no sense.

Desmond, when conventional leads were announced, did the SP go up or down? AIM is far from logical and nothing is a given. (except reporting of sells will be met with abuse)

What's your handle?

There's only one reason you assemble a team of such high calibre.
To deliver.
Firmly believe DC has set a goal of turning this venture into a Global Brand and having a team of that quality around him, he's giving himself the best possible chance.
These guys have worked for big brands and now they have committed to LVCG.
That's a statement of intent in itself.

Ben, I've tried that and failed to find it.
Though if I keep looking, technically I haven't failed. Apparently ;)
Anyhow, let's put it to rest.
Things were said, as yet they haven't worked out, let's hope shareholder value is realised for everyone, not just those in under a penny.

LeMajor, this statement is being difficult to prove.
I remember listening to a podcast and I'm pretty certain he said 100/200 return for shareholders.
I was in work at the time and didn't save the interview and have failed to find it since.
Either way, it's my belief he was referring to the riches we would all see if lucky enough to be invested at the time and they could unlock the HRZ.
We have people on this forum stating they are sticky holders all the way up to 75p within the next 18 months because that's what Dave said.
Dave has said a lot of things, probably best to take most with a pinch or two of salt.
AIMO

Mickey, my answer was in response to Ross who asked the question whether the company had ever set out their expectations. I believe they had.
It is ok to re evaluate the situation after a second shut in, and discuss it without the abuse.
But if you, or indeed anybody else here believes anything DW says on a podcast should be taken with a pinch of salt, maybe you should have voiced your opinion earlier.

ross, I think DW saying 100/200 bagger, putting a comparison chart in a presentation to a successful company, stating he would pay for people's houses (this year) backed up with fail fast comment leads me to believe that yes the company set out their expectations.

It's not empty. 400,000 acres full of the stuff. Unfortunately getting it out commercially is proving problematic.

Looks like paid per post ;)

Dazzle the message being relayed is the placees who took up the discounted 2p raise are long gone, before DW announced the shut in.

88 Energy, in consultation with its partner, Burgundy Xploration (together the "Joint Venture"), has finalised the well design for Icewine#2. Upon strategic review of the desired objectives for Icewine#2, the Joint Venture has concluded that a vertical well with a multi stage stimulation is superior to the initially proposed lateral well.

The vertical well design will allow the Joint Venture to:
decrease drilling risk associated with a more complex lateral completion

Patience required with this, it's only a matter of time before true value is seen.
The negative reaction to meaningless 2017 results, coupled with a seller has provided a good price for new buyers or those adding.
Very relaxed holding this, CEO stating company is profit making with huge margins.
His aim is to build a global brand and we are in fairly early.
Good times ahead.

Spoilsport ;)

Mikemike, pointless asking him because he is a liar. Caught him out when he let slip he sold a big chunk, I believe he meant to send a private message but posted on the main forum instead. Nobody likes a seller who is advising people to buy. But his reason for bailing was GB not going for shale and apparently DW advising we would need lots of drills to prove up 88e acreage. He sold far too early but it was at a higher level than this I think. Probably best not to antagonise for fear of him coming back to gloat.

Brom, can you recall why RH69 did his famous U turn?

What I read was somebody heeding the red flags. Selling to protect his investment and rebuying to maximise profit once the dust settled. If that is transparency there should be more of it. Better than abusing anyone and everyone that doesn't sign up to the desperate ramping.

0.305 was a buy.
0.3175 was a buy.
0.32 was a buy.
Everything at 0.30 are sells, lots of them for days now, but it hasn't gone lower. Yet.
I'm hoping we are at the bottom.
Possibly clutching at straws, but it's an observation and my opinion.

It's been pretty much NT to sell any amount for days and 0.3175 to buy.
Today the ask dropped briefly to 0.305, somebody bought and now the ask is 0.324.
Still NT to sell, probably selling at 0.3p. ( I activated a small dummy sell last week in error).
We don't seem to be dropping lower.
AIMO