Member Info for Grimbergen

I’m not in a good state to be honest BNC! Too old for that kind of mularky :)

Gracias BNC!

Your scribbles are much appreciated as ever. Missed them last night - out in Soho drinking ludicrously strong continental beers with my old footy chums. The head is hurting a little this morning - not sure stating at your crayon drawing has necessarily helped matters!

I’ll put Little Grim back in my shorts after this I promise..

Filthy. How could anyone drown in such a shallow paddling pool?

I can look at this two ways. On the dispassionate side, I think you are mixing up several concepts in your head, and your continual use of obfuscatingly vague terms that have no industry or specific meaning (eg overall grades) is either wilfully vague and misleading, or ill informed. ‘Cut off’ as Strider says is one thing, average grade is another, overall grade could mean other things too.

However from a more involved point of view, I think you know all that and you’re primarily here to disrupt and to downplay SOLG. You’ve been provocative, argumentative and cocky to the pint of irritation. It’s your MO. I’ve risen to that and admit I can be argumentative too but you take that to another level.

Read my posts - I’ve been here for a long time and I’ll no doubt be here when you’ve gone. I’ll filter you to avoid any future aggravation, I don’t think I’ll be missing much

Still misleading. And how anyone could possibly have missed your posts today!

If you’re going to stay up past your bedtime Filthy, use your time to read Mining for Dummies. Basic errors like the ones you’ve been making today shouldn’t be repeated. People have explained your mistake today in very simple terms. Educate yourself rather than repeating your misleading deramp like a parrot.

Good shout Shippy. Apologies to the Board for my part.

Perhaps I could, perhaps I couldn’t. I’m not sure it’s my job to do that

Unlike you I’ve never claimed I could, nor posted a load of rubbish based on ‘overall’ grades (which still means nothing if not ‘average’)

That kind of waffle and faux-analytics would be your domain.

Maths not Mathis!

TBH I’ve no idea whether you know Emily Mathis, Johnny Mathis or any of the Mathises

What I do know is that you are here to argue and loudly disrupt and you demonstrate a poor understanding of grades.

You stated (fact!) that the “overall resource grade at Alpala is less that 0.3%”. No it’s not.

By ‘overall’ I presume you are using layman’s terms for ‘average’ (overall means nothing in this context).

Categorically, you are wrong, and display a sorry lack of knowledge about Mathis and mining. You then compound your error by then asking who was asking abou averages anyway.

You couldnt make this shizzle up if one tried.

Thanks for the heads up Ship

If SOLG is sold for £2 per share, that’s the price shareholders will each receive (including CGP as a SOLG shareholder) for each share they own.

Not sure where you get the £1.70 from :/

Now there’s a name I’d not seen for a while :)

But your ‘bottom’ is considerably higher than my average. And 90% of my purchases in SOLG. I don’t easily resort to braggadocio but your empty boasts compel me.

So explain your relevance to me again?

You called the bottom?! Really?? Wow, now I’ve heard everything!

Big shoes to fill.... :)

Disingenuous - means not candid. insincere

But nevertheless I find it easy to see your agenda

Was that too complicated for you?

No loss of confidence at all in where this is headed, at least not by me.

It's Ok to call out some short term disappointment without thinking the sky is falling down on all your plans. This remains a hot ticket and I'm all aboard. Doesn't mean you can't be balanced in what one posts.

I find your posts very disingenuous, it's very clear which way your wind's blowing at any given time, but each to their own I suppose.

Close your mouth mate :)

You’re not?

Illusion shattered

Hi BNC / all

More of the same. Slightly deadpan NM, seems knackered although his tailoring has improved :) it’s probably hard to keep repeating the same excellent message and keep it fresh.

He’s obviously v bullish about further value to be added by Alpala and the regional prospects. My only slight worry was when he said “PEA Q1 next year, hopefully sooner rather than later”. Having just beaten his self imposed December delivery for MRE2 it’s heartening to see solgold returning to BAU deadlines!

It was a bit of a damp squib price-wise, although NM’s been telling the market for ages what to expect and he delivered. Just about. Sort of... the rich core extension does look great, mind.

So no surprises. Altho at least it was ahead of time. Another concrete step along the way.

This will be bought out, in some fashion, eventually. So onto PEA next and a drill into one of the new tenements I’d imagine. Yummy