On this issue I’m with Bozi. If you find Qs posts repetitive, predictable and frustrating, just filer him. I did months ago. You’re not missing anything and prevents us from reading your equally repetitive, predictable and frustrating replies (with a side salad of mild bullying)
Thanks For sharing DBW (and Mog for the webinar link - signed up)
The slides are interesting. Specifically the Blanca project slide. The subterfuge continues - Drill holes 3 and 4, assays pending despite having been completed several months ago. This one has always been a bit shrouded, the tight veins are perhaps not economical but the epithermal element has always shown promise.
Yet Solgold continue to be tight lipped - no visuals, nothing. Maybe it’s a dud (although CGP clearly haven’t previously thought so). Maybe they’re not keen to disclose. But I wonder why?
Yes, I suspect you’re right. I just hope it gets formalised (JV) rather than letting it trundle on for too long on a handshake. Unless there’s outside interest the wait could kill me before the SOLG and COVID-induced drinking does
Red - I did, frequently, but he’s deluded and (like yourself) clogs up the board with 10+ posts a day. Frankly I got bored of reading them never mind responding. I’ve had him on filter since November or so.
Frankly you also clog up the board (usually responding to Q) - you can see you’re retired or have plenty of time on your hands. I’ve not filtered you as you occasionally post an interesting perspective. But please try to refrain from entering the Quady circus, and if I have to read one more post about your daily sales and purchases I may just shoot myself...
RE: Warren Irwin tweeting about Solgold sale11 Mar 2021 07:44
Thanks for sharing sjn1980. Seems Irwin thinks the identity of the next CEO will provide a pointer to a sale (or not!), will be interesting to see who ends up in the hot seat (and their past affiliations!)
Tosh. Absolute tosh. Sorry if you were insulted, But a ‘quick search’ you did would have told you the facts. Rather than suggesting that NM was in some way crooked - which you then did in your next post while ‘half answering’ your own question (in your own words).