Member Info for Grimbergen

I’m in. It stinks

Oh I’m distraught! :C

Regarding the manipulation, proving intent and/or collusion is the challenge in these cases. And you’d be stupid to leave any evidence

I know BNC, words cannot describe (the size of it) ;)

I’ve made a report to the FCA. Just an acknowledgement, nothing more and no visible action.

There are reports available regarding FCA’s compliance actions and fines, but there aren’t many to review. Which tells its own story

I guess we’re rather hamstrung and at the mercy of the bigger players

Gawd knows. FCA perhaps, although accusations from a bunch of PIs vs a well grounded and researched complaint from the company itself are probably dealt very differently

As you say BNC, it’s clear to see as the arse on Mrs Grim

Addict, stop being so sparing with the truth (surprise! Not)

Unless there is a clearly articulated reason - the articulated reason is the potential destabilising effect of a massive change in board membership at a time that a major shareholder is accused (without rebuttal) of seeking to influence or seek control of Solgold by the back door.

Seems clear and well articulated to me!

Are you another BGP stooge like RK (our resident BHP cheerleader)?

RICH3R, nope. Me neither

Someone has a very strong interest in either a) making loads of trades because they’re really bad at the whole investment thing or b) using them to control the price on a pretty illiquid share in which they (or the people they’re acting on behalf of) have a very strong interest in (and looking at the evidence, interest =keeping the price down, or within a range).

Hmmmm now which could it be?

If this isn’t manipulation, I don’t know what is. Incredible, and sailing very close to the FCA wind, particularly if collusion is involved between different shareholders…

Telegraphist, suspect you’re right. I have some sympathy with that position too but personally I’m wary of giving BHP an easier entry, in any way

Ignoring his bad maths for a moment, having RK on this board at the moment is like having the CEO of BHP posting.

I’ve never seen a more obvious agenda spouted so often (excepting Quady perhaps)

Amazing stuff. Like a one man anti ‘old board’ pro BHP campaign

The slow SLOG goes on zzzzzz

Thanks Mog

* waves from the undergrowth *

Wow, those 6 days of silence passed quickly.

And now back to the board bashing. It’s not seemly for a septuagenerian finance and corporate (and not forgetting head hunting) legend!

Your very overt recent agenda has rather blown your cover RK. Not to mention your sole obsession with Solg (doesn’t seem like the actions of a ‘retired pro investor’ to me).

Best dig out another ID and come back with some fresh bull to feed us all. Suggest the handle WalterMitty1

RK, your repeated calls for CJ to become CEO are pure speculation and wishful thinking - unless you’ve been told otherwise.

What makes you think he’s even in the hat never mind interested and/or keen?

Pure speculation to fit around your narrative. Unless of course you’re claiming to have yet more information ahead of the market?

and lots of the A trades a similar £300-400
odd

As you say, the letter opened up more questions but with v few answers provided

It’s also somewhat disingenuous - BHP have been stirring the pot (and caught doing so), but perhaps the most destabilising factor right now is the lack of CEO, CFO and news.

Get your own house in order first solgold. So frustrating

JG1964, thanks for sharing - very informative and in-depth analysis on the state of copper supplies.

What f-in right do you have to know how many shares I do or do not own? We all know what you claim to have because you mention it 20 times a day. Discretion is the better part of valour, as they say.

Are you seriously insinuation NM was behind the crux report?? Talk about casting aspersions without any evidence.

I was here long before your daily domination of the narrative on this board. I don’t feel the need to justify myself to you (nor should you to me) - the difference being that I’m not throwing out long but unverifiable essays trying to position myself as the de facto expert here.

You make some good points, you also make a number of unfounded claims that I’m not sure stand up to scrutiny. It’s not my job to debunk them. People can make up their own minds

My problem with you isn’t that, it’s the fact you seem to want to dominate the narrative here, and I think that smacks of hubris of the worst kind.

You said the other day you were going to move to the ADVFN board. Prove to us you’re a man of your word and jog on.

“You either believe me or you continue to post unsubstantiated rubbish...”

What a pig headed ego maniac you are. So it’s your way or it’s tosh?

Your unsubstantiated rubbish is no more informed or factual than anything else I’ve seen on here.

Stop trying to dominate the agenda

But only a few people I can see peddling their agendas hard. ‘Not self serving’ my backside

Some very naked lobbying going in here. For who’s benefit you should all ask yourselves??

Yours? BHP? The ‘old’ board? The individual themselves?

Somethings certainly rotten in the state of Denmark. Fascinating times, not least because a few people are showing their true colours.

I’ll watch and learn with interest (and a big dollop of salt)

that's put a BHP-shaped cat amongst the pigeons!

Sits back, lights cigar, waits for fireworks....