We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
Stay the course Bubble!!!
Test ssmith_trader at 7am this morning said “On this point Quady is right. These small trades are PI who are bored with SOLG especially with so little volume.”
Deliberately disingenuous or stupid? Take your choice
So many subtle and obvious games being played on this board…
Exactly BNC, the argument that these are PI buys is absolutely laughable
Post Brexit market manipulation legislation:
https://www.simmons-simmons.com/en/publications/ck3syn2ankauk0b48d8k8hbzb/market-abuse-regime-after-brexit
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2019/1212/pdfs/uksi_20191212_en.pdf
Report a concern to the market abuse team:
If you are not a firm or trading venue (examples of persons professionally arranging or executing transactions) or a whistleblower, but want to contact us about suspected market abuse, you can email market.abuse@fca.org.uk.
Please include as much information as possible so we can assess your concerns. Please tell us:
- the name of the financial instrument which you believe has been used in or impacted by market abuse
- the identity of any people or companies involved
specific dates and times of any transactions which you believe amount to market abuse
- an explanation of your reasons for believing that market abuse has been committed
https://www.fca.org.uk/markets/market-abuse/how-report-suspected-market-abuse-individual
I’m in. It stinks
Oh I’m distraught! :C
Regarding the manipulation, proving intent and/or collusion is the challenge in these cases. And you’d be stupid to leave any evidence
I know BNC, words cannot describe (the size of it) ;)
I’ve made a report to the FCA. Just an acknowledgement, nothing more and no visible action.
There are reports available regarding FCA’s compliance actions and fines, but there aren’t many to review. Which tells its own story
I guess we’re rather hamstrung and at the mercy of the bigger players
Gawd knows. FCA perhaps, although accusations from a bunch of PIs vs a well grounded and researched complaint from the company itself are probably dealt very differently
As you say BNC, it’s clear to see as the arse on Mrs Grim
Addict, stop being so sparing with the truth (surprise! Not)
Unless there is a clearly articulated reason - the articulated reason is the potential destabilising effect of a massive change in board membership at a time that a major shareholder is accused (without rebuttal) of seeking to influence or seek control of Solgold by the back door.
Seems clear and well articulated to me!
Are you another BGP stooge like RK (our resident BHP cheerleader)?
RICH3R, nope. Me neither
Someone has a very strong interest in either a) making loads of trades because they’re really bad at the whole investment thing or b) using them to control the price on a pretty illiquid share in which they (or the people they’re acting on behalf of) have a very strong interest in (and looking at the evidence, interest =keeping the price down, or within a range).
Hmmmm now which could it be?
If this isn’t manipulation, I don’t know what is. Incredible, and sailing very close to the FCA wind, particularly if collusion is involved between different shareholders…
Telegraphist, suspect you’re right. I have some sympathy with that position too but personally I’m wary of giving BHP an easier entry, in any way
Ignoring his bad maths for a moment, having RK on this board at the moment is like having the CEO of BHP posting.
I’ve never seen a more obvious agenda spouted so often (excepting Quady perhaps)
Amazing stuff. Like a one man anti ‘old board’ pro BHP campaign
The slow SLOG goes on zzzzzz
Thanks Mog
* waves from the undergrowth *
Wow, those 6 days of silence passed quickly.
And now back to the board bashing. It’s not seemly for a septuagenerian finance and corporate (and not forgetting head hunting) legend!
Your very overt recent agenda has rather blown your cover RK. Not to mention your sole obsession with Solg (doesn’t seem like the actions of a ‘retired pro investor’ to me).
Best dig out another ID and come back with some fresh bull to feed us all. Suggest the handle WalterMitty1
RK, your repeated calls for CJ to become CEO are pure speculation and wishful thinking - unless you’ve been told otherwise.
What makes you think he’s even in the hat never mind interested and/or keen?
Pure speculation to fit around your narrative. Unless of course you’re claiming to have yet more information ahead of the market?
and lots of the A trades a similar £300-400
odd