RE: Red1 May 2020 12:10
aerial - why wouldn't I have a negative slant on things? Look at our MCap, look at our P&L, look at the debt we're building, look at the prospects we (seemingly don't) have as a going concern, look at how much money LTHs have lost and the enormous amount of hard work some, including you and I, have had to do to trade the rollercoaster of AIM to try and recover, look at the continued excuses for hitting critical milestones in our RNSs...……..where exactly are the positives in there? We can both crow about all the great things that COULD happen here, but there is no short term plan for a power plant, you can't build power lines across a swathe of east Africa in six months etc. We're in the **** and all the positivity and disagreement with those who do have a negative tilt is slightly pointless. The cold hard facts are staring us in the face. And yet again you're talking about people's motives, larry etc. There's no motive with me aerial - there's just a lot of negatives I can clearly see in a company that I have my hard earned cash invested in. I don't really care about the "I don't remember you...." nonsense because the way that is written it's simply bigging yourself up again. If you were that much more knowledgeable about things than any of us, why are you also seemingly sitting on a huge loss? From my own perspective, I have been invested here before we were Edenville and invested quite heavily early on, traded a bit, fell out of love with the share and sold up and then bought back in again etc etc. As an investor I have every right to voice my opinion, which from a company point of view is based upon the facts I see before me - all the accusations of motives etc etc and disagreeing with anyone who doesn't continue to be positive is simply a reflection of sticking your head in the sand. The jam tomorrow spin from the BoD ran its course for me sometime ago and I'm afraid nothing seems to have changed with AM on board. GW