Member Info for GreenWolf

bigeye - lying about what? That I'd sold out? Well, considering I've said on here numerous times that I have an eight figure holding in terms of number of shares, and still do, I don't exactly see how I could have sold out all my shares and raised £41....? Not sure how the maths of that works.

It's not like I posted that I was new to the board on a certain date but actually turned up before that....now that would be lying.....

Amazing how you rock up here to have a pop at me and tangentalise the discussion....isn't that trolling?

Yes, of course it was......pull the other one, it plays bagpipes

What you have quite clearly done is taken that post from June 2018, interpreted as I have sold out and then accused me of lying when I've continued to say I'm a holder. Why else would you bring it up today and point people to it.

Well, at least we've finally got to the bottom of it, not that you'll ever admit it.

bigeye - lying about what exactly?
You're the one that previously questioned the factual content of your own post....or are you now saying it was tongue in cheek?

No need for the abuse again (twaat)

That comment (on Page 554 of the Edenville chat for others) from July 2018 was tongue in cheek if you look at the post thread about a £41 sell - keep trying.

Perhaps your accusing me of not being a holder comes from your misinterpretation of posts.........what a twool

bigeye - why would you come on here after not posting for almost three weeks to say that it wasn't you that possibly reported Diggerman's posts? Not sure anyone did accuse you. Odd

Have you decided what date it was when you joined this board yet or are you still convinced that the facts you posted are wrong? Ah, well. Better to argue with yourself than others - you can only ever be right then :-)

Hope you traded Union Jack - you could see the ramping crew starting to lean into that a while back. Pump and dump on AIM? Who'd have believed it.

aerial - I don't disagree with what you say, but I've said before that on these public forums sometimes one can have little idea who is actually posting and who people may know...

And as I said yesterday, there are undoubtedly some people, perhaps me included, who have no intention of making certain things about themselves public - and there are generally genuine reasons for that.

But just because one of us isn't known to others doesn't mean we're not being truthful, open or honest in what we post.

Teaye - 4m30s onwards - "once we start showing good returns we should see the share price respond accordingly"

aerial - I'm not posting this to fuel the fire this morning but " the only person on this bb that has ever had a genuine line of communications with this bod" - I'm not entirely sure you can be certain of that.

Teaye - indeed.

History of our share shows no news isn't generally ready to be well received....
But, in all seriousness it's the lack of news flow - that "speculation" is bad for our share price because the market interprets it as not being positive. That's Rufus' legacy I'm afraid.

That said I did say previously that the news flow needs to be handled by AM carefully this month as we all know last years' results ain't going to look pretty.

So, my optimistic side is hoping AM has one or two positives to counteract the annual results, but not confirming the 1st September handover certainly isn't helping us. GLA

Given my experience, it's easy to ridicule people on here that you don't actually know. There are sometimes reasons people don't want you to know who they really are and don't trumpet the fact all over public forums, Twitter, meeting in cafes etc.

That's called self preservation and it's everyone's right to do it if they wish. There are also a lot of companies now (for those who still work) that have clauses in employment contracts about posting on public forums.

The facts are though that we haven't had a RNS from the BoD telling us that 1st September handover has happened, so are we assuming it has, or it hasn't?

That is a simple failing of our BoD not disclosing information that could move our share price on. It was three weeks ago.

How do you know that esquimo?

Sausage - I've no doubt I'll get blamed....:-))
The removal of Diggerman's posts clearly demonstrates somebody doesn't want any potentially truthful, but negative, comments posted. There's democracy and balanced views for you.
I far prefer looking in here now than posting. GLA

Don't feed the troll.........
GLA genuine holders - you know who you are

Yes, 8.5s have been quite telling this week - Friday 11th pm caught MMs by surprise and they struggled to hold it on Monday. It's been held all week but I suspect once there is a sniff of a bid, it will start to rise (hopefully....).

Oilriches - if you put "Disclosure forms takeover panel" into your search engine and go onto the Takeover Panels website there's some useful info on there.

GLA.

Yes, and for the second day running a UT value well below the level we've been trading at all day. What we'd all give for a level playing field....
Good weekend all. GW

abzzba - I won't be out of this over the weekend! GLA

Mike - was it a very clear whisper or slightly muffled....??

Oil - where's this 2.5p bid then?

Teaye - there are "Inside AIM" newsletters that were issued by the London Stock Exchange (in March and June) that confirms that annuals can be delayed by maximum 3 months and interims by a maximum of 1 month. But any delays must be RNS'd. GW

draft - there was an article in the Daily Mail last Saturday