Member Info for GreenWolf

Teaye - hasn't Arc's exclusivity agreement with Anglo American just expired? Surely they must be a takeover target at some point in the near future (not invested there BTW but been on my watchlist since 8p ish)

aerial - perhaps we should simply get Craig or one of the LSE Admin team to post something on here so we can return to a sense of normality.

Why do I need to email LSE?
I know it's not me.

Although I think the phrase you used on Monday was something like sad fragile case?
The verbal abuse and undermining of posters on this board has gone on for years. There always tends to be someone in the firing line and it looks at the moment as though that person is me.
You couldn't even apologise on the climate spat, which is indisputable fact, so I've no chance on anything else.

aerial - as you have no idea who it is either, then perhaps the easiest way is to stop trying to point the finger at me as you have done over the last two days!

You kicked this off with your post on Monday accusing me and followed it up, again, yesterday with another one - that Monday post you could share the content of with everyone on this board. I've given an overview of mine. Who else had posts removed on Monday?

I'll refer you back to one of my posts yesterday...clearly I have no idea either, but if it isn't you doing it then stop trying to undermine me by accusing me of doing it. We can all leave the playground then.
"Somebody is reporting posts on here and, as yesterday quite clearly demonstrated, it wasn't me.
So who is it?
And why is it you seem so keen to point the finger at it being me?"

LSE do indeed know the answer and I'm glad you have emailed them - my conscience is clear, so I have nothing to worry about. If they do come back to you with who it is, perhaps you can apologise to me.

Ah, I see. So you're now calling me a liar?
I logged on after 5.30pm yesterday after a very long day at work and responded to one of your earlier posts making accusations about reporting posts.
Can you tell me exactly how I could have reported anything during the day yesterday?
And why do you keep accusing me of reporting posts, despite it being impossible yesterday?
I thought you kept offline copies of all the posts - so you could easily share both of them on here, unless you have something to hide?
Amazing how those two posts have now gone and your post today was accusing me of reporting posts.

Explain? Perhaps share with the board your post from yesterday lunchtime that I responded to after I'd logged on?
Somebody is reporting posts on here and, as yesterday quite clearly demonstrated, it wasn't me.
So who is it?
And why is it you seem so keen to point the finger at it being me?

I noticed that this morning.
Interesting one of them was mine - I mentioned in the removed post I hadn't logged on until after 5.30pm yesterday so it couldn't be me. I also posted that it's almost as though someone is secretly reporting posts in the background so somebody can point fingers and how low that would be.
Didn't the Kibo board suffer from loads of posts getting removed aerial?

Tend to agree on the volume thing Pi.
If I recall correctly our previous breakeven was 4,500t so I would expect that figure to be lower for ILTL's setup. That's the whole point of us subbing it out.

It does suggest ILTL have reservations as to whether we can actually get to 3,000t per month output. The difficulty is whether we need that to be an average across the year or just the dry season. October to April has the potential to be very problematic for us as a mining company.

There are lots of positives around, but at the moment it's still all "potential". And we've been on the cusp before, many times.

The market speaks, hence our shareprice, and we have a litany of empty promises and targets over the last, almost, four years. But to be fair all it will take is a decent, tangible and positive RNS to get us on an uptrend. That's the key Alistair!

Sausage - a lot of the market is down today, but we all know that it's news we need.
Your recent price prediction is looking more likely unfortunately.
I like a nice face off with aerial occasionally. It's part of me finding inner peace. I don't normally post on Sundays but I found it very boring being in the pool to cool off.

Aerial - as you want to move on from climate...
One last question - how many rainy seasons do we have in the Rukwa region? Simple for someone who has extensive knowledge of our company.

Also you still haven't clarified the difference between an unsolicited and solicited proposal where a public body is involved. From my experience it's not hugely different between Africa and the UK in terms of process. Google won't really help, but the World Bank docs are good.

Aerial - you mocked me for pointing out that the Rukwa region has one dry season and one long rainy season. You said we had two rainy seasons. It is fact, not my view - indisputable fact. It happens the same every single year and has done well before any of us bought into this share. It is not "weather" - it is the climate of that region of Tanzania. You don't need Google to tell you that.

Your problem is because you dont like, trust etc me, you try and have a cheap shot at every possible opportunity to try and discredit me. You've done it with others on this board in the past. What was it on Friday? Anyone with half a brain or something? Look at the four posts you made after I posted fact about Rukwa's climate. You even had the arrogance to suggest Alistair had got one of his RNSs wrong!!

It is your arrogance and conceited behaviour, not just towards me, that is obvious. And it's there in your posting history.

I don't purport to know everything, but there are plenty of things I do know. But what winds me up more than anything is when people either make fun of others knowledge or clearly promote false information, potentially because all it is is a genuine mistake.

The climate spat on here is an absolute classic and even now you're still trying to play it down. Incredible.

Aerial - interesting, notably from a person who argues against indisputable facts. And still thinks they're right.

Sorry to disappoint you BE, I've still got three days to go, but there is no weekend homework now.
I didn't think you got paid to post here on weekends?

Aerial - nothing wrong with factual verbatim extracts from RNSs. Facts are, apparently, indisputable.

Although your post at 716hrs on Friday wasn't a factual reiteration of the RNS. I challenged you on that basis and you descended the board, again, into an argument. Bit like the weather issue and definition of profit.

Its easy to throw accusations and insults, like conceited, at other people. It's almost as though there is some subtle agenda around undermining people's credibility......

It is far more difficult to accept when you're clearly wrong or less informed / experienced in something than another poster. I am, still, waiting for the apology on the weather spat. Indisputable facts, eh?

So, this solicited approach you now believe we have had - clearly another mistake in one of our RNSs. I've searched for the required public notice from the Tanzania government....but can't find it yet. Happy for you to post the link to where it is on the TZ Govt website and I'll apologise.

Let's keep the board factually based and balanced and if it does all turn out well, we can all reflect on the journey whilst we sip our next glass of Krug.

Learnt it all from you.
You've not answered the question about public procurement regs, although I suspect I know the answer.
Like I say, the market reaction is far more telling than anything we post on here.

So you understand the requirement of public procurement regulations around solicited approaches then?
A little knowledge is a dangerous thing.
You're not losing the will to live aerial. You're just out of your depth.
The paragraph in the RNS means nothing as yet - its talk. Look how the market has reacted....

aerial - you clearly have no idea what an unsolicited proposal is and what happens to it in terms of process when it goes to a public authority, even in Africa. There is actually a document about it on the World Bank website. I'd post a link but you'll just brazenly dismiss it.....

But as you never admit your own deficiencies in knowledge, particularly after you've tried to make someone look like an idiot ("surely to anyone with half a brain cell...") it's pretty pointless posting more about it.

You carry on ramping this piece of news as a breakthrough because you don't actually understand what it does or doesn't mean. Because I do understand it, I'll keep level headed until our BoD come up with something tangible.

Good weekend all, even you.

aerial - you do understand what an unsolicited proposal is, don't you?

PMSL / beggar's belief - explain?