Member Info for Greenmachine67

Ok, I'll move it over there....apologies to the holders here..

Answer my question please. Cez have said lithium processing might be integrated and that's a big difference to your purchase of assets at a very favourable discount

Malik, an offer by emh/cez will not accepted wrt you npv percentages. Nobody from znwd is going to sell at these values....why should they? Doubling emh npv by increasing mine output would be better for all concerned and we wouldn't have to raise or dilute by getting involved in Germany....good luck to holders here

So Malik, if as you say, emh/cez are interested in purchasing znwd then what price would be put on it and where are we going to get the money from?

I'm sorry Malik, you've harped on about this for a long time. Tell me how much of a premium ganfeng supposedly are offering bcn holders?
Sorry I'll take my chances with emh/cez thank you very much....

Interesting RNS from znwd but I'd fear the Trojan horse that is ganfeng lurking in the background. Ok, their offer for bcn is not official yet but it looks likely they will make an offer. Once complete they will have a toehold in Europe with the possibility of a takeover of znwd, although politically this may prove difficult. Sorry, I don't want emh to get involved here.....

https://twitter.com/RuminationsOn/status/1409431214386262016?s=19

Answering your own questions to get a convo started DP.....lol. Time you're filtered. Another one of the many trolls on these boards who aren't invested but keep coming back to stir the pot. Cheerio.

I'm afraid sharing processing facilities is not the same as buying the German side.

Thanks monster.....totally agree. All we need ATM is a bit of patience and trust....

https://twitter.com/LithiumIonBull/status/1407392091685195780?s=19

May

First post......mmmmm. You've quoted the RNs but you've left out some of it. After "market value" the paragraph continued "albeit subject to any applicable regulatory approvals required at such time, including shareholder approval."

DP, almost everything you've said in your last diatribe is absolutely and verifiably untrue. Please, in future take the time and effort to at least show some understanding on what's going on here. For someone who is not invested here it's bewildering why you even bother...

If you've read it then surely you have the link....so post it yourself

DP, please stop talking absolute garbage. Have you read the cez/emh agreement? No decision can be made at board level without a unanimous
decision. So please stop it......

Ok, fair enough. .. so that then leads to the next question.......why is there such a small difference between esp off and on. Doesn't make sense to me...

On first reading of Fridays end that was my first thought..... the flowrate was higher than I thought possible. However, the flowrate maybe doesn't differentiate between oil and water. They perhaps have given the total flow and not oil....

Sid, I agree he's not worthy of mention but to any casual listener the omission of emh in any of his rambling might have put people off investing in the first place.

Maybe something in it, maybe not. Unfortunately I couldn't read the tweet because I'm blocked. Mr Lowrie, if you go far back enough with his podcasts never mentions emh. Even when he spoke of the European lithium landscape we were given a one-line "let's not get into a ****ing against the wind contest" WTF......when I asked him what he meant by that he blocked me.....seems to me that he has some kind of agenda....