RE: Starmers stupidity17 Aug 2025 06:42
Asi
"By sheer conviction counts, White people top the list; but on a per-capita basis—and at early justice stages—Black and other minority groups show higher contact rates with the system. It all depends on the metric you use.
Policing also plays a role, like the stop-and-search practices by the Metropolitan Police. Their data shows that more Black British individuals are found with concealed weapons compared to White British individuals, but they conduct more stops and searches on Black British people, which skews the figures. In Manchester, the situation is different because they have strict controls in place that ensure no single ethnic group is disproportionately targeted and more white British have been found to carry concealed weapons."
That isn't the answer to the example I gave. Why don't you ever answer the questions you are asked? You use ai to support your narrative which is quite easy to do depending how you frame your question to it. Just my opinion not ai's mine with no help from ai.
I have looked at ai and its answers in a bit more detail and I tend to find whilst it gives you an answer it then tends to go on and give caveats of why the answer given isn't really the answer and can't be relied upon. Too much noise it's ok for information but I wouldn't rely on anyone making decisions particularly policy decisions on it.
Politicians dream really as it can give you information overload so you never have to make a decision and can always find an excuse why you don't have to and you don't know how reliable the sources of information are. Much prefer real people to draw their own conclusions and do their own research and then debate it and come to a conclusion. Not saying it doesn't have its uses to help with that.
Sign In
Follow the stocks
