Member Info for GraphiteTech

For being very abusive when posting in what appeared to be a drunk state a few months back? What a shame to waste a life obsessed with something like this with the outcome of such having no effect on your own life positive or negative Think you have to feel sorry for such folk, it must be very hard.

Would have thought the IPO investors would have stuck around longer than a 20% move. Some folk are so fickle.

Is Bills typewriter working again?

Asset in South america. This is a 20p+ share

No raises here for a while, BOD do not want to dilute and I would suspect will be looking at 20p plus for the next raise

This volume is fantastic given the small free float. Expecting a real move to come here yet.

From the IPO but they will soon clear, Giving anyone who wants to load up the chance. Read the RNS does it elude to Cobalt also? I think it does.

Read the RNS guys. This is a near term producer that is well advanced and just added $521m at a high recovery rate to its JORC in-situ metals value Talk about under valued. £20m+ mcap would still represent value.

It is in a different league to GWMO MrCalm. Years down the development path and thus the discount to the JORC should not be that substantial

It is an advanced project so the discount to in-situ metals within the JORC should not be the usual massive disparity.

Double figures if not more the target here.

£500m plus JORC upgrade

MM I don't think they will buy the assets off the shelf. I reckon I have a good idea on where they will get the plant from. All your base less assumptions mean absolutely nothing. You are just a typical BB troll whose set up a recent avatar on lse to create negative sentiment against this company. I have come across hundreds like you and will likely see hundreds more Same modus operandi. Create new account. Post negative repeat rubbish. Get proved wrong. Disappear. Create new user name. Start cycle again. You are at stage two of the above I guess.

This is the timescale eluded to by the company for production post study release, this was in a broker note from 2016. Three plus years is fanciful some may say 'pure speculation' whilst the below has been prepared by folk with mining engineering/project backgrounds. Something you lack I suggest to be making assumptions in the manner that you are. H2 2017 Appoint Project Staff  Q3 2017 Acquire Suitable Processing Plant  Q3 2017 Submit Environmental Applications  Q3 2017 Submit Operational Licence Applications  Q1 2018 Commence Plant Erection  Q2 2018 Appoint Mine Contractor, Start Decline  H2 2018 Commence Production.

"That's where I'm coming from really Brentharg - only recent changes in the zinc market have caused any interest" Seriously? I would never had guessed that, an upwards metal commodity cycle in zinc and copper creating interest here? Are you for real, apart from stating the obvious I find you constant banal droning of repeated Ad infinitum utterly pointless. Yes it is speculation, find me a junior resource that is not, yes it's success needs a sustained level of zinc/copper prices at these current levels, find me a production mine that would not suffer the same. We have suffered the pointless deramp/negative posts now for a few days, we get that you do not like this company and it is not for you so please jog on and help out posters on the thread of a mining stock that may be even further behind this in getting to production.

Great posts and thanks for the clarity given to the point I raised. Much appreciated.

Suggestion that capex for the larger facility will not be in the region first anticipated. That will have a significant bearing onthe overall metrics and quick payback on investment which should help with debt funding. Possibly not the RNS we wanted but the best one they have released for some time.

Others seem to have no issue extracting gold from VMS deposits? Would think if the silver was extracable the gold would also be? http://www.geologyforinvestors.com/volcanogenic-massive-sulphide-vms-zinc-deposits/

Next Catalyst The company is set to release the updating scoping study for the Parys Mountain project “before the end of June 2017”. If this confirms the numbers highlighted above then we can expect a very sharp move in the company’s share price to reflect the size of this resource and the current market cap of the company at just £9m. On a previous update the companies share price moved from 2p to 14p intraday, so it does like a move on news! Add this share to your watchlist and do some research… But be quick as it will explode as soon as the RNS lands… Could come at any time now! The share price at the time of writing this post was 5.00p If you feel the numbers in the note are not correct, please let me know using the comments box below.

Assest Calculations: 20,000 tn Zinc @ $2,721 = $54,420,000 8,000 tn Copper @ $5,770 = $46,160,000 7,000 tn lead @ $2,235 = $15,645,000 Total revenues: $116,225,000 Minus processing mine costs $47 per tn X 360,000 = $16,920,000 Minus Shipping/logistics Concentrate @ 20% weight-ore 20%/360,000 72000tn @ 10$tn = $7,200,000 Smelting costs @ $200tn (metals) 35,000 X $200 = $7,000,000 Total Costs: $31,120,000 Revenues – Costs: = $85,105,000 (£66,654,236) per year That gives the Parys Mountain project an $85m per year Net Profit. All metal prices/shipping/smelting price units from June 2017. Given the size of the resource and the estimated annual mining volumes the mine life would be between 10-16 years. Other Company Assets As well as the Parys Mountain project the company also have an interest in two other resources. Anglesey holds a direct 6% interest in Grangesberg (a world class Iron Ore project) and a right of first refusal over a further 51%. The company also currently holds an 11.9% stake in Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Limited. This holding is expected to change to around 25% on the upcoming restructuring deal.