RE: excellence?19 Oct 2020 19:11
Also, you need to retract Doog’s comment from your tiny list, as he said the toleration was excellent. Which it was. But he didn’t say the results themselves were excellent. The truth is that there was a lot to interpret, which kinda happens from the term ‘headline results’ in that they are not detailed. We are yet to receive these. Also, you clearly pick and choose your arguments too, as the scientists on this bb stated at the time that the trial design meant they couldn’t be excellent this time, but it’s the patterns from the full results that we will be looking at and are what will matter. Twisting all the time...
Why you would waste your time frequenting a board so often, that’s full of ‘brainwashed cult members‘, for a company that you’re not invested in, I’ll never know... beats me how anybody has the time...