Member Info for gotreal

"..could be anywhere between 2p and 4p IMO. GLA.." At least you didn't add IMHO ....

Tungsten.... have a biscuit.

"$249m net assets and a $140m market cap, with $11.5m net cash and $65m owed for the SA assets, means net of those you're buying JLP at a 63% discount to NAV ex-cash and receivables..."

Substitute the word wishful for tantalising ....

Do you think anyone cares? Pathetic ego.... look how clever I am.

Junior ... as if it isn't obvious, Papa has an axe to grind....

I'm sorry, Jack, Leon is the victim of his own performance. He has consistently over-stated reality only to be shown to have done so time and again and it is his inability to hit his own targets that have materially contributed to the woeful performance of the share price. His future rewards MUST be tied to actual performance. The status quo cannot maintain.

For the avoidance of doubt, and so Jolly is clear, JLP has requested authority to issue shares, in some years up to 30% of the float, EVERY year for the last 10 years. And to prove this is standard practice, in their 2025 meetings, so have Tesco, BP, Rolls-Royce, Reckitt, Marks and Spencer and Smiths Group. For UK listed companies, these resolutions are standard governance plumbing. They are usually framed as giving directors flexibility or prudent capital-management headroom, not as a signal that management is definitely about to issue shares. Tesco explicitly calls the core allotment authority “routine,” and Smiths explicitly says it wants to “maintain flexibility in managing the Company’s capital.”

So, Kalan and the other knockers/traders.... stick it in your pipes.

"It is standard practice for UK-listed companies to request annual authority at their Annual General Meetings (AGMs) to issue a percentage of their total share capital."

"There is no doubt about it, Red Setter contains gold. How much, nobody knows at this stage and even when the results get back from Perth that is only a starting point as more drilling will be needed which will no doubt prompt another placing or two. But this deposit does not need to be huge to make it an attractive bolt on for Greatland (GGP) which owns the 15 million ounce Telfer deposit."

Your brain....? "Should the company be immediately wound up with assets returned to shareholders? "

Fitzy, I remember thinking that ... and then a "buoy" popped up. "Fingers Crossed" should be the QED motto.

I have squandered my resistance

For a pocketful of mumbles

Such are promises....

Still, a man hears what he wants to hear

And disregards the rest

Still holding .... but find it amazing that a company can survive this long when words are the only things they have really delivered .... Hopium is a powerful drug.

Sorry, Jsrsuperstar... can you outline the actual news (which would have to be RNSd) that came out of the call yesterday. I watched but all I heard were encouraging words of what they hoped would happen. Such as "My feeling is that we're getting very close now" .... which accounts for a 20% rise in the share price...

Hydras, just accept that the reported trades as buys or sells are purely generated and not accurate. That you obviously didn't know it is the issue.

Can it David. Many people here have in good faith, on the basis of what the board has claimed, invested hard-earned money in this share, some over 20 years, and propped the company up time and again supporting share issues resulting in the likes of you still having the "opportunity" to invest. Unfortunately this has been at a great cost, as the claims made by successive execs have not materialised. Such investors have a totally valid reason to feel aggrieved and you have no right to belittle anyone for that. Making money out of share price movements driven by "promises" that never materialise is not the same as making money from a successful company generating profits, and until QED actually does that then the board needs to have its feet held to the fire far more than it has in the past.

Chatmandu

Posts: 562

Price: 3.65

No Opinion

RE: Progressing fast13 Mar 2026 10:03

I think they've messed up the construction.

They should have build the shelter at 90 degrees to the centrifuge mounting so that the roof panelling could be removed and the (second hand) centrifuge could then be craned upwards between the roof supports. If the centrifuge goes kaput they won't be able to swap it out without completely disassembling the structure.

Shareswotter

Posts: 272

Price: 3.65

Hold

RE: Progressing fast14 Mar 2026 10:45

After catching up on the last days nonsense comments on here the one that amuses me most is Chatmandu's statement that the centrifuge building is all wrong. He is obviously not an engineer. When he sees a future photo showing a crane rail attached to the webs of the roof structure running the length of the building to the outside, to enable major parts to be lifted out, it will dawn on him. (ex petrochemical Project Engineer by the way ).

Chatty is just a spreader of lies... worthless and disreputable.... as if everyone doesn't know that by now.

Nope. As I said ....naive.

Duuuuuurrr ... why do you think he posted that c;r;a;p? He's sold already.

"if the Q and A goes well " What, even more promises...??

Wrong in what way? The buys and sells are only estimates. Everything else is irrelevant.