RE: Nancy Edwards6 Jul 2020 16:20
Anyone watching would have been truly shocked by the process.
Chairman wanted to move on but Nancy made it clear that it had been refused (6/5) without a legal reason for refusal being submitted (makes the vote unsafe) it was then that Nancy recommended a short break to establish the legal reasons.
Legal, chair, planners all recommended approval, environmental and highways approved the submitted plans, and what was perfectly clear was the the HGV was the point being challenged yet no legal reasons provided. Total shambles as best.
Many of us complained, and whether I get it all not I've advice SCC that I will be pursuing my losses for the 2hrs following, what I think is an illegal council decision.
Gold