RE: 16p tax losses equivalent1 May 2022 19:39
sorry Mirasol, I believe that HUR is incredibly attractive to a purchaser (at the right price obviously). Yes HUR is vulnerable to 1 well, but I think the Geo's and data room will show that there is a significant degree of confidence in the well now and following on from last update the gas reintroduction is mitigating the need for any water injection. The confidence in well 8 would indicate that within 12 to 18 months HUR could be producing circa 15k plus. With no debt and $200m in the bank after funding circa $80m for the new well. A purchaser will take this into account, whether to strike now or wait and pay more? The tax losses are substantial and someone line Harbour Energy will see HUR now as a clean entity with AM under contract, no debt, no hedging and material upside that Harbour's economies of scale can exploit, added to the need to show the treasury that it is commited to UK North Sea reinvestment. CA are looking to exit, they have focused on the tax losses, they have no confidence in the HUR executives and I am sure will not want to plan for a new well and the risk that, that will entail. 20p would see a significant return, equate to circa $400m which is the gross value of tax losses ( however complicated the CFO makes out) and the existing cash balance , 9k production and acerage thrown in for free!