Member Info for GIVMESUNSHINE

I personally disagree - only time something will happen is after Next friday - both parties will know thier position with all evidence on the table... then have a clear month.. judge will want them to use that time to reach agreement IMO and will probably instist on medition to continue..

should get some updates over the weekend on docket bird
Deadline today August 12, 2022: notify court of agreements reaching during meet and confer: parties are ordered to meet and confer on outstanding objections and shall advice the court of any agreements reached latest by 1 pm
- August 15, 2022: if a juror questionnaire is to be used, an editable questionnaire shall be jointly submitted to the deputy clerk in charge
- August 18, 2022: pretrial conference: August 18: 8 at 10.30 am and August 19: 9 am before Judge Gilstrap
- September 12, 2022: Jury selection 9 am and show time

So pleased to see Samsung have lost their motions 133 and 84 - I think this is big news as it seems this was their entire defence - to change the claim construction ,, really good news .. Samsungs only real defence is to invalidate the mark man and or Ptab - it’s as clear as day they stole it .. but in Samsungs eyes there was nothing to steal .. with all evidence and arguments on the line by end of next week - I think the shift of power has just gong massively in Nani’s favour - bought another &10k first thing - I don’t think Nano will RNs this .. but huge news for those of us who follow - well done Nano

A lot to close by Friday ugust 12, 2022: notify court of agreements reaching during meet and confer: parties are ordered to meet and confer on outstanding objections and shall advice the court of any agreements reached latest by 1 pm

Samsung will appeal any award .. but it will also open the flood gate for more claims .. nanos presentation talks about this subject .. one thing we have to bear in mind is that Nano managed to convince a litigation funder - and they would have taken some convincing going up against Samsung .. we can be sure that Nano have some very strong evidence .. but will those expensive samsumg lawyers have a technicallity to wiggle out of it ? or this all huff and puff .. exciting times

Hi All The $789 million NPV was based on 20mt and $900 tonne .. looks like more recent scoping are looking at $2000 tonne over the life of mine so i think our NPV will be much higher the $1billion - $900 has to absorb the $249 tonne costs, so any hise from $900 has a massive impact - $651 mt now - at $2000 = $1751mt .. - multiply the 50% upgrade to 30mt and think the NPV will rise to about $3billion + and thats without the additional drills .. Or am i missing something ?

Hi all - thing is, thoughout the carnage since April - Lithium SPOD is strill trading at record high aution prices and must be the only metal that hasnt dropped at all - infact 10% higher.. everything lining up nicely - way undervalued to our peers - and a flurry of activity will confirm our scale, listing , and intentions all in one go .. that wahy we are drilling more 50-60 mt on the way from the deep imo - with an excellerated P1 mining plan - a bit of funding of the back of a succesful listing - this ti me in 2 month be kicking yourself for not buying those low 30s IMO

Calm before the storm - all going to the timeline at the moment

Hi All

One thing i dont understand is how with such a technical complex subject can the trial be completed by a jury in a week ?

Agree Hawi - however I would say that cherry reflects about 50% of Nanocos Current SP.

Back to Samsung :0)

We must be getting close to a ruling on motion 133 .. Its done the rounds now, and looks like samsung had submitted more exhibits.. I think we can expect an unpdate on that soon?

you can never be 100% but reading that and the previous response from nanoco where they debate the 4 arguments , it does read like a teacher marking a laywers homework.

Roll on trial -

Many Thanks for the link (i was looking at the motion numbers ..

I think the Nanoco reponse to 133 is noe od the clearest, written in plain english responses you are going to get.. Having read the samsung motion i was confused .. Having read the Nanaco I am not ... The tome almost has an element of bewilderment and sarcasmr at the approach taken and slaps it down with some very clear statements - Accusing Samsungs layers of attempts to "fool" the courts intelligence and deliberately removing /altering the classifications from the Markman and PTAB - Everyone invested should read that - Some of my favs below

By truncating Nanoco’s statement, Samsung also fails to disclose that Nanoco was repeating Samsung’s own expert’s testimony from this case applying this Court’s construction. This can hardly be a new position to Samsung warranting reconsideration now.

Samsung cannot now claim that its own expert testimony from this case, faithfully applying this Court’s construction, rises to the level of a manifest injustice requiring reconsideration of the very claim term Samsung’s expert was applying. That is both absurd and legally deficient.

The Court should not be fooled by these manipulations.

Nanoco’s opposition to this folly was entirely consistent with the Court’s claim construction and is not “new evidence” warranting a reconsideration now

As this Court recently noted in denying another motion for reconsideration of a claim construction order brought by Samsung, “[p]arties with clever lawyers can always think of something more to say, if given the opportunity,” but “[t]hat is not the test for reconsideration.”

I wont post again i'm not a deramper - just stating to truth - its all there in black and white.. you should perhaps read it and you might not feel so bullish .. I hope you all do well though, if AM ever gets RBL - i'll 100% change my mind.. but he wont

Morning - The thing is Aurther has screw shareholders over with the latest funding - with all those convertable bonds millions of convertable bonds @16.5p PI's will just be feeding our money to them for it to be forward sold .. Weve seen the bullish statemnts about funding before and they all turn out to be lies and payday loan ... what RBL major bank would fund COPL? He may be able to bullshet PI's buts hes killed shareholder value, only one getting rich is AM and his mates

Morning - Are you sure youre referring to 173? I cant find docket 173 listed with any attachments - Cheers

Hi All

Godd posts, just catching up ..time flying by and lots going on docket bird. Interesting debate ..I still hold a fear that no matter how strong the argument, the one with the biggest pockets wins. but very keen to see how the trail proceeds. GLA

Barnstorming performance - full year could be looking @ 15% year divi - See the statement about returning profits to shareholders? plus company is EBITDA and Cash puts this on a very low rating when you consider the amount they are investing in growth

Getting ready for the fight ... cant wait for the trail to start ... Well worth reading back the investor presentation.. We are going to court to prove willfull infringment on 5 claims only from 47 .. and that is chosen by us.. Samsung may well let this go to trail .. but as alluded to withi the presentation .. whilst even if samsung lost, they could apeal / drag it out .. it would open other areas such as europe for injunctions on sale of QD TV's .. One thing that it dont quite get is that this whole trial will be done within a week .. I assume all the work is in the prep and dockets we are seeing now...

Rocky moment and Creed is just realising he understimated his opponent..GLA

its still not that easy to buy .. not really that many selling either .. to small mkt cap for this amount of growth

ok Fair point - pressure has come from somewhere - perhaps the aquired comapnies not that happy - SH certainly cant be, and J didnt have any skin in the game .. This could be a great recovery play if they can get thier BOD act together .. revenues up and margins up at a very impressive rate .. cash burn low .. SP down 80% -90% - not a mix you see that often .. Charm offensive / news coming IMO .. J knew he was going the day after that news IMO