Blatant ramping or complete an utter delusion23 Oct 2024 08:39
In the past, there has been some justification for taking a more optimistic view on the company's potential, and generally, whilst the relative positions of the ubers and the sceptics have been pretty entrenched, its worth noting that 95 percent of the former uber gang no longer post responses to any of the criticisms levelled at the company by the sceptics. Does this mean that they are now beginning to (grudgingly) accept that the sceptics may just have had a point, and that, looking at the weight of evidence stacked up against the company, any form of defence would be a difficult construct in the first instance, but secondly would look completely risible?
I suspect that the above is the case for the majority of the (former) ubers, but there is always the exception, namely Haggis and his multiple aliases (we all know who they are) who keep spouting the same unsubstantiated drivel about where the company is going again and again, and again.....the question really is how a single entity, using multiple aliases is allowed to hijack a board and move it away from a forum for rational discussion, and turn it into a totalitarian state, where only one narrative is allowed.
The question really is whether this indivdual, in their many guises is either pursuing this ridiculous campaign and a remunerated basis, or whether they are simply some kind of delusional fool who has bet the house on this thing, and simply cannot accept that they might just have been had, either way, their actions are damaging to a forum which should be a platform for reasoned argument, which this one currently most certainly isn't.....
Rant over