George Frangeskides, Chairman at ALBA, explains why the Pilbara Lithium option ‘was too good to miss’. Watch the video here.
The ownership list was from Refinitiv not from bloomberg terminal, as I have access to both. And Refinitiv list only shows 51% of the total ownership of the company and there are 49% which is unshown for nominee account. The majority of the updates for holders were dated by sep/dec 2021, not till this date. Just for clarification.
Well said and very relatable for my situation Dave, but I have full confidence that we will be rewarded soon as LTHs.
See his post on 09:51.
Okehurst1, I would 100% want to say yes. But this is just wishful thinking rather than based on fact. It appears the ISO and CE can be obtained at the same time for companies outside Europe, but not the case for the ones in Europe. You need to consult with experts on this.
I came across this document showing the validation taken on Innova test: https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5e8444f9372f7161749366af/t/5f252b2cb71b7012a5403a0f/1596271422787/TriedandTested+Rapid+Antigen+Test+v2.0.pdf
Points take away: 1. on Page 5: the analytical LoD is 0.4ng/ml, which is 400pg/ml. This is higher than the 300pg/ml claimed by Avacta. This would indirectly imply our sens is higher than Innova. I won't go into much details on ox report as different units conversion is not my strongest suit.
2. on Page 12: the CE certificate used is from Xiamen Biotime. Play pay attention to the section (b) ISO13485. The dates for issuance and expiry are a bit of a surprise to me. It appears to me that the ISO accreditation automatically grants all products made from the accredited manufacture. And we know BBI has obtained ISO13485 as well (and Avacta lab probably too). I hope this can ease the nerve for some of you and have a good weekend. GLA.
Hi Nixynoo, re "Better that 300ng/ml being reference to the requirements of the government in the tender that closes tomorrow, components that are readily available - another reference to the tender document" in your post. You implied 300ng/ml is the requirement in gov tender? Is the unit correct? ng or pg? Sorry for all these posts, have a good day.
*tender
Toatie, yes I'm fully aware of this but thanks for pointing it out. My confusion lies in the mention of 300 in the gov render. Is it in Ng/ml or Pg/ml, as it's essential to draw a reasonable reference to our sensitivity?
Nixynoo, thank you for your insights. Can you please clarify if it's 300pg/ ml, or 300ng/ml?
Yes, bodes well for the findings in ox LFT report: Inova test's sensitivity is subject to sampling methods due to being swab, and a layman test like ours will surely be the solution for it!
I wouldn't want this fantastic post to sink. Thanks again Nixynoo.
Re John Bell's concern on saliva used on LFD, please have a look at BBN's post: https://twitter.com/BigBiteNow/status/1328272319748452353
Hi Nixynoon, really appreciate your efforts to get this info, especially point 2. Seems no reason to reject the possibility that Avacta is a possible candidate.
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/more-rapid-covid-19-tests-to-be-rolled-out-across-england
Ophidian and Myles post:
https://twitter.com/Ophidian18/status/1319262433790353408
Thanks Goldieloc13 I am reading his other tweets, making a lot of sense to me.
PAH00, exactly! Laughable really.
Many thanks t the poster who shared the twitter of Jon Deeks. Absolute treasure. Please have a read of the Specificity computation from the iAbra test, for a laugh:
https://twitter.com/deeksj/status/1306215312363327488
Hi Timster, this is just for knowledge sharing on this board, to help our fellow investors to make the best judgement for ourselves. And we have no idea if any influential investors are among us. GLA.