Member Info for GingerHippo

I agree with Phil's post. We have an asset of global significance. There is global interest.

It's not for nothing that EUA was chosen to represent Russia at Indaba. That was just over a year before the recent JV with Rosgea - a company wholly owned by the Russian government.

https://www.micon-international.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Table1-1.png

I think Brian said it was a closed period in the recent investor phone meeting.

Horse's mouth?
More like donkey's backside.

Forgive me but I don't understand where you're coming from.

You can't use revenue to value a company, only net profit or free cash flow, which were both negative last results.

If I've read the RNS correctly, the bondholders are taking 95% of the company. So what was worth $45M on Thursday should now be worth £2.25M.

"The big money was made in the waiting” Jessie Livermore

Anybody who thinks this is a scam must also think out BoD are stupid. Because I can’t think of anything more stupid than to “pump” the sp from 0.4 to 14p but instead of selling they go ahead and enter an FSP so they can’t sell, an NDA so they can’t “pump” anymore, and then get a huge biggest bank and huge law firm involved.

Oh, and 3 of the BoD have been suckered into joining the “scam” half way through. Apparently they didn’t notice all this stuff the derampers keep saying. Bunch of thickos. Masters from Oxford notwithstanding. Yeah, why not leave a cushy well paid job as ceo of a large mining company to join a company worth, what was it tiger, £50M....? I mean it’s not like you’d think carefully about such a move before doing it, right?

https://acfequityresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Eurasia-Mining-Plc-MA-Valuation-FINAL-ACF-03022020.pdf

C1
Reserves of category C1 constitute the main part of reserves of explored and mined deposits of geological structural complexity groups 1, 2, and 3, and also can be identified in areas of detailed study of deposits of complexity group 4. The size and characteristic form of the mineral body, and main particularities of the conditions of formation and internal structure are explained; variability and possible discontinuity of the mineral body are estimated. The outline of the mineral reserves is defined in accordance with the requirements of conditions according to the results of sampling of drill holes and mine workings with consideration of data from geophysical and geochemical studies.
An „Indicated Mineral Resource? is that part of a Mineral Resource for which tonnage, densities, shape, physical characteristics, grade and mineral content can be estimated with a reasonable level of confidence. It is based on exploration, sampling and testing information gathered through appropriate techniques from locations such as outcrops, trenches, pits, workings and drill holes. The locations are too widely or inappropriately spaced to confirm geological and/or grade continuity but are spaced closely enough for continuity to be assumed.

C2
Reserves of category C2 are identified from exploration of deposits of all complexity groups, and in deposits of geological structural complexity group 4 constitute the main part of reserves to be included in mining. The size, form, and internal structure of the mineral body, and conditions of formation are estimated from geological, geophysical and geochemical data and confirmed by intersection of the mineral by a limited number of drill holes and mine workings. The outline of the mineral reserves is defined in accordance with the requirements of conditions according to the results of sampling of a limited number of drill holes, mine workings {e.g. trenches, pilot-scale pits}, natural outcrops or by their biota {indicator plants ?}, with consideration of data from geophysical and geochemical studies and geological structures
An „Inferred Mineral Resource? is that part of a Mineral Resource for which tonnage, grade and mineral content can be estimated with a low level of confidence. It is inferred from geological evidence and sampling and assumed but not verified geological and/or grade continuity. It is based on information gathered through appropriate techniques from locations such as outcrops, trenches, pits, workings and drill holes which is limited or of uncertain quality and reliability.

Anyone not sure what’s at MT should refer to the RNS on 15/6/17 followed by the RNS on 4/12/19.

I'm always saddened to see people lose this kind of money.
We all make losses sometimes.
I hope you all make your money back and then some.

Youngman, there's no need to feel down
I said, Youngman, pick yourself off the ground
I said, Youngman, 'cause you're in a new town
There's no need to be unhappy

Young man, there's a place you can go
I said, young man, when you're short on your dough
You can stay there, and I'm sure you will find
Many ways to have a good time

It's fun to stay at the YMCA
It's fun to stay at the YMCA

More than 1
Less than 27 million

Sorry Dunt, but that's ridiculous.

Of course most of the work is done by juniors. That's true for all jobs - big or small. But everything is reviewed and agreed by higher-ups. That's the way it always works.

To remind you, in H1 2020 UBS concluded 50 deals for a total of $66.3Bn

It's not like they have loads of jobs so small they just let the juniors do it all themselves. As you can see, the average deal in UBS is worth over $1Bn.

*Says something stupid, fully expects backlash. Calls the board toxic in advance. Ridiculous, mate.

Bill, it’s not even about them being angels. They would have a legal duty to report any fraud if there was any. But there’s nothing to suggest any fraud has been committed

Oh I forgot about the auditors too. Accounts due in the next 2 months.

All of these people would have a duty to report fraud if this was what was happening. Almost a year in and there is no evidence to suggest anything fraudulent is happening.

What an absolute nonsense.

Absolutely Reasearchandhold. The idea that the lawyers and bankers have neglected their legal and professional (not to mention moral) duty and been complicit in a huge fraud for the sake of a few quid, is so ridiculous it is honestly not worth considering. Not to mention the takeover panel which exists solely to protect shareholders from an abuse of an FSP.

Quick look through posting history. Posted a bit up to 01 Oct 2019, then absolutely nothing for over a year until 16 Dec 2020 when s/he suddenly started posing on the EUA board. Almost 200 messages since then, almost all are on EUA.

Agenda driven? You betcha.

Speculating that something is "likely" is the exact opposite of stating "home truths."

A year ago we were at 7p. So we've done 450% in a year.
A year ago it had already more than 10-bagged from 0.4p.
If you go short and the sp halves, like you think, you make 50% profit.
If you go short and the sp does 5-bags plus from here, like the rest of us think, you stand to lose 500% or more.
Even if this was a 50:50 your risk/reward analysis is crazy.
If you are so confident you're right despite all the instis that are on board that you are willing to go into a bet with such bad odds............. I think you need your head tested.
If someone stays out because they're not convinced this will multi-bag , that I could understand. But to bet against it is reckless and stupid IMO. Honestly.
You have been warned. Nobody is going to cry for you if you lose a bundle.

Yep.
I'm a poet.
And I didn't even realise I was rhyming before..........