RE: Gladstone16 Sep 2019 23:26
The notification may well not be instant, however I believe that the date that the transaction took place has to be stated correctly and the dates I quoted are those shown.
Also, if, it were the case that the dates were day one, two, or three days behind when the transactions actually took place as you seem to be implying then it’s even more strange that in the two, three, or four days prior to the MW article being published that Gladstone, and on two of the dates, also MW were increasing their shorts.
The whole thing stinks !