Member Info for gemstar

They seem to be only targeting 150t Cu ( 3000t mined ore) initially
I thought they were targeting 7000t as the starting point

These are Ophidian's steps to end of August

' 7. Additional batches made again at pilot scale to clinical standards for first time clinical evaluation. Supplied Wk1/Wk2 Aug Happening Now - Time to complete clinical Validation ~21 Days
8. In parallel with clinical programme; Scale up to production scale. Include Tech transfer and validation batches (again put on stability to generate data) - Happening Now
9. Evaluate data from clinical programme (establishes the FINAL Selectivity and Sensitivity of the test) Aug Wk3 &Wk 4
10. Generate the Regulatory dossier including clinical data, stability data, development data and supporting data from early designs wk4 Aug'

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-00502-w

'indicating infection'
I thought antibody tests didn't show up infection for 10 days odd ?

It's about global distribution to the general public

These sound like the barely audible, early Elvis, 1950s echo chamber style
And Prelea, talking 20 to the dozen ,is almost unintelligible, and impossible to follow
Time for Vox broadcasts to install audio equipment that is less than 50 years old

Market makers are obliged by law to action volume of shares 5000 and under

Actually ,other than BBI, it is not clear who or what will be manufacturing
The expression 'the companies ' quoted by Ophidian is vague

Thanks

'. I have two other stocks (with good grades too) with similar types of CEO and they are just as frustrating'
Could you tell us what these are ?

'could we see a T/O of the diagnostic div?'
I wondered at the time whether that was the real purpose behind the LSTM tie up

Judged on their record, I have no confidence that this board will be able to refinance the Atlas $7m
I am expecting $3.5 to be refinanced by a yet further placing
And the other $3.5 by debt finance

'ever expect that level of detailed insight '
Normally I agree
But when the whole future of a company is dependent on a couple of paragraphs in an agreement, I would expect it to be properly spelt out

And I'm still not sure whether the board knew the extent of what Pickford was up to with his debt structures. There was a comment somewhere that it was left to him
Definitely not clear whether there was an absolute obligation to carry on financing mines in Zimbabwe to the end of time, as seems to be the suggestion
That would depend on the precise wording of the agreements, which of course, like the Atlas financing, shareholders are not allowed to see

 "Only someone utterly inert would still have an average of 0.6."
Or someone who trusted what management were saying, and thought they knew what they were doing
It is now obvious that BP was never,ever financeable without dilutory placings
No way was it financeable with standard debt finance
I know not at what point the board realised that

https://www.theguardian.com/world/ng-interactive/2020/aug/08/covid-vaccine-tracker-when-will-we-have-a-coronavirus-vaccine

It's quite simple. There are so many companies trumpeting about tests that it is difficult for the retail punter to tell one from the other, until the product is validated and produced, and seen to work
Atm it is a 10% traders stock. Buy in morning. Sell in afternoon

https://www.businessinsider.com/bill-gates-coronavirus-interview-vaccines-masks-and-us-leadership-2020-7?r=US&IR=T

" I'm trying to make the point that his views don't always match the share price reality. "
Ha, ha, ha
Are there actually ANY posters on AIM whose views match the share price reality ?
Although I agree it is irritating when megabulls suddenly vanish into the ether with ne'er a backward glance
I've called a few like that out myself in my time

I thought they were obliged to quote for 5000 shares ?