Member Info for Gcoffey

One breach is too much Imo. To have 3 raises some serious questions about TalkTalk's management. The attacker apparently compromised a public facing server, a weakness that would have been flagged in regular audit or at the worst it should have been detected by an upstream security appliance. This shows that audits are not carried out across the whole TalkTalk infrastructure and that they have inadequate first line of defence security appliances (if any). TalkTalk need to take a serious look at what they are doing, stop doing it and do it better.

Any breach of security has massive ramifications for the targeted company, think lock everything down and only give employees access on an ad-hoc basis. I've worked at companies that have had breaches, not on the scale as TalkTalk or Sony, but any breach should scream out to management that processes are broken and should be replaced especially where customer data is involved. TalkTalk have been rather cavalier in playing down the latest breach, they have no idea what data was taken and customers that are looking to cancel (using the breach as an excuse) are being told to prove their data was taken! Where customers are your business, your business is your customers... sadly not in TalkTalks case. The third breach this year, TalkTalk have failed to implement even basic measures (encryption) to secure customer data. I imagine their systems remain as lax as they did after the first breach and here we are again, third in a year. Companies that fail to protect their customers data should be suspended from trading until they can prove measures have been implemented. Heck they could even use guidelines such as PCI, securing systems & data is not overly complex, the issues lie in the processes on accessing that data which PCI addresses.

Always found them a decent company, they look after their customers and employees and are constantly evolving the products they offer. Definitely one to hold for the foreseeable.

11 September 2015 cloudBuy plc ("cloudBuy" or the "Company") Resignation of Nominated Adviser and Suspension of trading in the Company's shares The Company notifies that Westhouse Securities ("Westhouse"), the Company's nominated adviser ("Nomad") and broker, has resigned with immediate effect. The Company is in advanced discussions with an alternative Nomad, and expects to appoint a new Nomad in due course. Accordingly, pursuant to AIM Rule 1, the Company's shares will be suspended from trading on AIM at 7.30am today pending the appointment of a new Nomad. If a replacement Nomad is not appointed within one month of today's date, admission of the Company's shares to trading on AIM will be cancelled.

Nomad resignation. Company has one month to find new nomad.

Haha that's quite laughable. If taulia are so sure their offering is superior why would they need to take a stab at tungsten, unless of course they feel the need to apply some leverage in order to sell their solution. Poking a stick at the SP is quite a weak marketing ploy Imo.

Been very quiet since all the contract news a few weeks back. Price ticking back up. Hopefully some updates soon.