Member Info for Gaviscon

The bottom line is the deal has now been detailed in an RNS twice since it was sealed! It’s an RNS! It’s a legal obligation to tell the truth, to not lie. What is anyone suggesting here?

GG, are you suggesting the deal is fake?

Broke, are you doubting the credentials/existence of the board members mentioned?

Craw, what is the problem? Come on, let’s discuss

Broke,

Far more interesting to list the ones that don’t! You can’t, and that’s the point! Until these people come along, no one will know them. I am a successful businessman, I don’t have a LinkedIn profile. Never really felt the need. Why do I need to tell the world?

Cheap swipes as expected. I actually knew someone in here would pick the scuba diving out of the whole RNS and make that cheap gag.

Not everyone has to have a LinkedIn profile. It’s actually a great sign of confidence in your own abilities if you don’t have one in my view.

It’s a real ‘take me for who I am and what I have done’ kind of statement

Still posting GG?

Despite being exposed as a poster that regurgitates absolute BS, you are demonstrating that you have no shame!

Do you actually expect the people here ‘that know’ to take you seriously anymore?

It’s all you have left isn’t it!

That the deal, announced in an RNS, confirmed in an RNS and explained by the bod many times is a false deal. Really? Is that really all you have left?

It’s really quite sad.

When the first payment comes through, are you going to say it’s counterfeit cash? When the company is listed in the US are you going to say it’s not? When the company announces more deals are you going to say the deals are fake?

Come on! It’s starting to get embarrassing for you all now. GG, I honestly thought better of you.

Crawshaw, you just go along with whatever GG says.

Can’t help yourself. Here you are still making stuff up and spurting it to whoever will listen.

You have no idea what’s actually happening. Hardly selling shares in huge quantities are they? Are they selling any?

Whatever suits you at the time is what you type. A classic keyboard warrior

You were very very wrong GG.

54 days.

The sp will be just fine

Let’s not forget that GoldenGod got everything so hideously wrong!

‘Who would invest £280 million dollars into a £35 million cap business for 49.9% of the business’ they asked! They just couldn’t get their head around it.

‘If the deal is made, you will never hear from me again’ they said! Yet…. Here they are, still posting, still mocking. More front than the final frontier!

Now, apparently they will go when VLRM receive the first $4.25m. I’ve come to the conclusion that GG is full of BS.

7.5 weeks and he will be gone then hey! Not long in the grand scheme of things. Shall we start the count down?

54 days GG

Golden G, your posting style has changed?

Something different to your normal posts? You have replaced the usual absolute certainty that you were right and everybody else was wrong with a less confident style, riddled with sarcasm.

I think you’re just hanging around hoping that something will happen, where you can come back in and say I told you so… just leave it. It’s over

Golden G, I’d have thought you’d had enough of getting it wrong by now! Still here though! I find it quite disappointing when someone can’t accept that they may have got it all wrong and throw their hands up and admit it to all.

Let yourself down there I feel.

I’m not going to drag it all up again. I’m not going to regurgitate all your old messages where you got it wrong, despite the fact you do that at every opportunity. I just hoped you might just admit it.

It was a howler to be fair.

Well Golden, there it is, as I have said many times.

$279.5m in return for 49.9% of the business.

I guess that’s cleared it up. Now, where’s that seat belt?

San, as I believe that VLRM will receive $200m I can’t agree with you. I also believe the value of the company is now set by the $279.5m for 49.9% of the company.

I’m a lth as you know. I’m happy with my position. I’m on thin ice in TG myself, but I don’t see why you wouldn’t be allowed back, your contributions were always respected

San,

I haven’t seen any investor talking about $200m “in the pocket”. It’s clear that a $200m underwritten asset is now sitting on the balance sheet, it’s also clear that $79.5m will be paid to VLRM over the next 5 years.

With this in place, VLRM should grow, particularly with an additional $1 billion facility available.

As a share holder here and now, I’m not so bothered about 5 years in. The company really is in a place to motor on now. But, we have the asset for 5 years, we have the income (just under $4m a quarter). I can’t see a down side

It’s an interesting one San. But in 5 years, does it matter much? Not to me for sure.

1.44% of 243,000,000 x 60 would mean they can sell 210,000,000 shares in 5 years, leaving 33,000,000 shares.

If it’s 1.44% of what’s left each month then they can sell 141,231,600 shares, leaving 101,768,400 shares

Sorry, meant 1.44% of the 243,000,000 million shares every month or 1.44% of what’s left each month

Broke,

It depends whether it’s 1.44% of the $200m every month or 1.44% of their holding every month.

Golden, you have been consistently wrong in fairness.

Your words here give me comfort.

VLRM is the vehicle here.

Regulated, invested in businesses that are also regulated.

Compliance is key in this world and VLRM have it.

If you want it quickly, you have to buy it. Very relevant in an industry where time is the master.

$279.5m is nothing and will prove to be a bargain.

San,

Gary does say that we have strategically swapped 49.9% of our company for $200m in notes and $79.5m.

I believe that when the notes mature, QGP will either buy them back for $200m or roll them over.

VLRM may still need the asset to remain listed on Nasdaq.

It’s likely they won’t as in 5 years this could all be academic. I think this cash injection and the asset injection are solely to get the company operating at a higher level in the sphere and listed on Nasdaq. The shares will be irresistible to the Americans and the sp rockets.

San,

I don’t think there’s much to worry about but I do get your point.

It’s whether you feel the shares are sellable or holdable.

If I was the MD of QGP, having made the investment I would be feeling like they were keepers.

But, if the MD of QGP feels there is no future added value, they will be dumped.

Would the MD of QGP feel that way though? Having put those $$$$ in, I doubt it.