Member Info for Gaviscon

Craw, why are you questioning the name? It’s just speculative trouble making to suggest the deal, which has been announced TWICE by rns is not real

Well maybe when QGP was formed they wanted a name beginning with Q. The point here, yet again is that you are posting speculatively with the sole aim to stir up rubbish.

Craw, the point I’m making is that you are implying that because the TH group deny involvement in Crypto that it’s misleading. Not if you keep to the RNS’s it’s not.

But to suggest that VLRM is a directly connected Crypto company is. The SP is not dictated by the crypto world directly and therefore is nowhere near as volatile.

Why are Amazon called Amazon when they have nothing to do with the Amazon Craw?

Craw, you are talking about comments made in the TG. Not by VLRM. Read the RNS’s and stick to the facts.

As for why they’re not reporting it? Are they not reporting it or are they not reporting it according to Huw they should be in your psychotic brain?

Ask the TG maybe? Who knows. Opinions are opinions

Gag, if the RNS reported that VLRM has a btc treasury and we haven’t had another to say Vlrm does not have a btc treasury, what do you think the answer is?

Gag, bless you. I am indeed happy to lose all in every single investment I enter into because I keep to the rules. Only invest what you can afford to lose. Simple really.

Broke asks questions based on his opinions. Does he need to air that to all of us? Not really, unless, like the rest of the gang, there’s an agenda.

I’m happy to read and digest the official news releases and make my mind up as to what I want to invest, as I have done today.

I don’t then have to create other questions to which there are no official answers. No one is going to answers these questions. You know that, Broke knows that, even GaG knows that.

So why ask them? Just be patient and enjoy the ride. That’s what I do.

No concern here GaG.

I’m loving the ride. Just interested in facts, not speculation. Broke just proved a point. A whole post on ‘back to basics’ asking questions based on speculation.Craw does it too (even though he just denied it) as do you.

Let’s talk about facts.

And just to confirm, no break down here. Loving the ride. As you know, I’m happy to lose everything in VLRM so where would the concern be?

I’ll rewrite what I said earlier. 80k was a buy, so why the red day? Made up rubbish

You, GG, isthis, all basing ‘facts’ on your own opinions. It’s total garbage. Happy to engage with rns based facts but that’s not possible here. Speculative carp coming from idiots

Abusive behaviour? Really?

In what way have I been abusive other than to call out the made up shizzen that comes from this group.

Classic case of you can give it but you can’t take it!

I’m good thanks Craw. Just think it’s time to call out the made up carp that is constantly regurgitated in this group

San, you are also delving into the speculative domain.

Do the board need to respond? Did the deal get reported as complete? What do you need to know about the funding that hasn’t already been reported via RNS?

Broke, if your questions were based on fact, you wouldn’t need to ask them.

They are all based on speculation. It’s a great example of the constantly regurgitated drivel that is seen on this board from GG, Craw, PP, yourself.

Broke, you’re another one.

It brings you back to your earlier point? That you made up in your head.

That’s rich coming from you GoldenGag. Tedious whining! 🤣

You literally fill these boards with the very essence of tedium with your constant statements of self importance, the drivel is incessant.

State facts GG, not opinions

Oh really GoldenGag? You seem to have everything at your finger tips…. But hey! Not this time… oh GG, you take us all for fools.

You know exactly what you said. To be honest, I couldn’t give a toss if you stay or leave, you are cheap entertainment and you clearly have lost your gorm