Member Info for gary25

I take it all those with grievances,will be attending the AGM,to vent their spleen at the accused?

What a pity. In short, shareholders on the AIM market generally do not have a direct, binding vote on what directors pay themselves in wages. Unlike Main Market-listed companies, AIM companies are exempt from producing formal Directors' Remuneration Reports or submitting remuneration policies to a binding or advisory shareholder vote.Instead, director remuneration is typically handled and approved by the company's Remuneration Committee.However, shareholders are not completely without influence. While you cannot directly vote on standard wages, you can exercise your rights through the following mechanisms:Voting on Incentive Plans: While wages aren't subject to a vote, any introduction of or material changes to long-term incentive plans (LTIPs) or share option schemes usually require shareholder approval.Transparency and Disclosure: Under AIM Rule 19, companies are required to disclose a breakdown of each director's remuneration (including base salary, bonuses, pensions, and share options) in their annual report. This allows you to scrutinize pay and voice dissent.Annual General Meetings (AGMs): Shareholders can vote on the re-election of directors. If the remuneration committee is deemed to be paying the board excessively against company performance, shareholders can vote to remove the directors or the members of the remuneration committee itself.Minority Shareholder Protections: Under the Companies Act 2006, shareholders holding at least 5% (or 25% to force an extraordinary general meeting) of the voting shares can propose resolutions regarding executive pay or petition the court for "unfair prejudice" if excessive pay is draining the company to the detriment of members.

Think its called mates rates for large investors or institutions.,just a theory thats all.As you say time will tell.Hope iam wrong to be honest.

I rest my case.

Can a share price be manipulated down by money makers +8 Yes, share prices can be artificially manipulated downward. Large institutional traders, hedge funds, and market makers use specific illicit or questionable strategies designed to intentionally suppress a stock's price for financial gain.Market makers are meant to provide liquidity and stabilize prices, but their heavy market presence allows them to utilize tactics to their advantage. The most common ways a price is driven down include:Bear Raids: Traders intentionally borrow and rapidly dump large volumes of a stock to trigger panic and force the price down. They profit by buying the shares back at the lower price.Spoofing and Layering: Manipulators place massive sell orders without the intent of executing them, creating the illusion of heavy selling pressure. This tricks other investors into selling their shares, causing the price to drop.Short and Distort: Short-sellers aggressively short a stock and then spread false rumors, misinformation, or negative media coverage to damage the company's reputation and drive the share price down.Regulatory bodies actively monitor and penalize these actions to maintain fair markets. In the US, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) investigates deceptive practices, while in the UK, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) enforces the Market Abuse Regulation to deter and prosecute market manipulation.How you can avoid a beating from these thugs - MoneyWeek11 Mar 2011 — And when they want to get hold of some stock, they are not above resorting to a bit of tree shaking' - especially after a decent run-up in the share price. MMs ...MoneyWeekMarket manipulation - WikipediaFor other uses, see Manipulation. In economics and finance, market manipulation occurs when someone intentionally alters the supply or demand of a security to i...Wikipedia6 Types of Market Abuse | SIX7 Dec 2023 — This type of manipulation is called a bull or bear raid depending on whether the aim is to cause the price to rise or fall. Pump-and-Dump. Pump-and-dump is a pr...www.six-group.comMarket Makers' Methods of Stock ManipulationTH E MARKET MAKER In theory, they will buy low, which reduces the decline in price per share (PPS), and sell high, which reduces the rise in PPS. Therefore, the...Digital Commons @ West Chester UniversityMarket Manipulation (4 Ways to Protect Your Organisation) - Redcliffe Training20 Nov 2025 — Let's break down the most common schemes that regulators are watching for. * Pump and Dump Schemes. Remember that friend who wouldn't stop talking about their "Redcliffe TrainingMarket Manipulation | Business and Management | Research StartersThis manipulation often involves spreading false or misleading information, artificially inflating or deflating stock prices.

Looks like we are being manipulated down for a placing,certainly not selling pressure causing it,as only minimum amount of sells taking place,but thats what happens with AIM.Think the next update needs to be a blinder and not some wishy washy statement,especially if a placing does take place,even Saints have only so much patience.

Our understanding is that the President has also approved this and the instruction is now being relayed back to MINMIDT, but since we are not a party to the internal processes of government we can say no more than this. Shareholders should understand that the Cameroon government has quite formal approval processes, and as with many governments the elapsed time for them can be lengthy even when the process is positive.

Unfortunately Our understanding,might not be there understanding.

Guess thats what makes this guy Barton Special.

Uncleal.Ditto mate.LOL

His brother Dick told him.

To say.

As stated,Chevrons signing off in Namibia took 12 months to complete,which I have to day suprised me,but it is there in Back and White.The point being,if it takes a major 12 months to complete,how long for a minor.The wait goes on.

One has to say,if this was BP,Shell,Total,or any of the other majors waiting for a sign off from the Cameroon Gov,dont think it would take too long before they received it.Thats the only problem being a minnow in a big fish world.Dont think JA has enough clout ,not his fault,Iam sure he is doing all he can,after all its in his interest as well.Dealing with Govs on this issue must be a nightmare,as they have probably so much more important things to deal with than a small outfit like TRP.Patience of Jobe on this one.One day Thomas,one day.LOL

Arrivederci.

Anyway

Thankyou for your best.Think we will leave ot at that as you seem to be struggling with the concept of whats being discussed with your one track statements.You clearly dont understand whats been written ,or choose not too as it suits your mantra.Any enough,we will agree to differ on this issue.

I wish you well,as I do all involved with TRP.

Gary not a bully.

Just sick of weak PIs crying on a chat forum.

Err,I think that could be classed as verbal bullying.

I actually did not mention anyone in particular,but if the cap fits,and yes i do hold in fact and have faith in JA,as i have said before.However that still does not mean you cant discuss things.I would not class it as moaning,when the questions are pertinent to the issue in hand.

Funny,I thought this was a discussion board,were shareholders aired views between one another about the progress or not of said share . Unfotunately that includes having to read posts by dictatorial bullies who think that their way is the only way.I hope this does not stop other holders giving their thoughts on here,otherwise whats the point of these boards.

I think we would all be happy if indeed that killer RNS came within the next few days,bit define the word few.LOL.

On another note wonder when the remaining Licences will be granted,and to whom.

Though the Company is still waiting for written confirmation of this. The Prime Minister's office has separately told the Company that it is convening a meeting together with MINMIDT and SNH to bring the matter to a conclusion, and the Company expects the requisite documentation to follow soon after that meeting.

The trouble is on balance,the wording of that statement implies this meeting to implement proceedings would take place in the not to distant future.This is obviously not the case,so I dont think a bit of clarification on this matter would go amiss.It would be good to know how often these official meetings take place,so we have some timescale at least.Mind you nothing we say on here will change proceedings,but thats what chat boards are for.LOL.