Member Info for Garonne

A very welcome rise today and on the back of the steady progress made from the depths of 17p, it looks impressive but can it be sustained? Possibly is my view, if AFC can achieve their own recently set targets for power tower deliveries to Keltbray and Kier i.e. Keltbray about now and Kier within the next fortnight. We need to also bear in mind, we're only getting back to where we were in June so caution is required.

Couldn't agree more MP. I'm now wishing I'd loaded up at 17p. Lol. If they can deliver to Keltbray and Kier as indicated then the SP might start to head back towards previous levels. It would be nice to have a rise on the back of in house developments rather than just sector driven.

It shows that after several months since its deployment in Manchester the efficacy of the test must be at least satisfactory. If it hadn't been effective they wouldn't be promoting it on Twitter! Hopefully more NHS trusts are about to deploy it based on favourable outcomes in the Manchester trust!

https://www.defenseworld.net/2022/08/10/afc-energy-lonafc-stock-crosses-above-fifty-day-moving-average-of-23-72.html

Pommy now showing his fully fledged ramping agenda. Didn't take long in your new guise Pommy!

My average is 68 Chucky. Long way to go! The thing is if they could get their act together this could really fly. Most frustrating.

https://www.express.co.uk/news/science/1653129/rolls-royce-nuclear-reactors-energy-crisis-tobias-elwood-bills/amp
Tobias Elwood pushing for better momentum on SMR.

I see the slight reduction in US inflation has given the SP some respite. I hear you Bondy but it's difficult as per Reonin's reasoning. His post captures the source of my and many others frustrations perfectly.

Your argument makes sense Roger and I'm beginning to agree that DB is not covering himself in glory. 70p would still be a loss for me so hoping for more eventually. I don't, however, have the confidence to average down given the ongoing dire SP performance. Let's see what happens but hopefully some good news breaks soon to reward patient LTHs.

So shall we just pretend it wasn't published Pommy? Have you been posting here before under another handle? You seem to be playing the ramper game of pretending all is well at AFC whilst ignoring all the past disappointments. I smell an agenda!

https://www.lse.co.uk/rns/AFC/half-year-report-wxy9e6brf4mmrz2.html
Read that Pommy, especially the Outlook bit!

On a more positive note. Could it be that AFC are prioritising the ABB "S" cell order and consequently assigning more resources to it thus impacting the power tower deliveries timetable? After all they need to keep ABB sweet as that's where the big orders will come from. I'd be happy if this is the reason for current delays! Time will tell.

It's still very relevant Chucky. Past form is indicative of future form and anyway how can such a huge failure be just conveniently forgotten?

With genomic diagnostics set to become the way forward in early disease detection and preventative medicine and as GDR are at the forefront of this revolution, you'd thing some of the big pharmas would be sniffing round. Could this explain the lack of news?

You let them off too easily AFC! I wonder if you "expect" multiple orders what the probability of NONE being realised is? Pretty low I'd say unless of course the multiple order expectation was not the real position to begin with. Too many AB apologists on here who seemingly refuse to accept the bleeding obvious i.e. investors have been mislead and are continuing to be.

"AFC Energy expects to announce multiple new system orders in the second half of this calendar year."
I guess orders would equate to sales m3, unless they were proposing to give the units away!

Apologies. They said in the "coming" weeks not several, which amounts to the same thing. 6 weeks is over a month. Anyway, the point is the original delivery date has slipped significantly with no explanation as to why. If they're agreeing delivery dates that they know they can't achieve just to get news out there, then that would be deliberately misleading not just to shareholders but customers too and could cause reputational damage. It's definitely not a good look.

I wonder what has changed since March to push Keltbray's power tower delivery back by at least 6 weeks? Unfortunately, AFC are behaving rather predictably here as even their revised, timetable announced on 29th June, of "several" weeks for delivery is proving misleading. They just seem incapable of being properly transparent on expected progress. Disappointing as ever.

It's not a fuel cell!

And after Anita buying 150000 shares in the last week. I guess the recent underwhelming results and the vicious analysts at JP Morgan have given the shorters free rein. Let's hope for something to thwart them soon. The ITP money would be a start.