Member Info for Fyoz

It's not a pump & dump, it's a big seller exiting, another 11m or so shares offloaded today. But he has a finite amount to sell, so eventually the decline will reverse

"completed all of its planned trial work "

So your assertion is that they can't change their minds?

It was current at 21st July, so in that respect it's the latest information

Stephen Williams, co-CEO of Reabold, commented:
"We are very encouraged by the indications of permeability within the system, and of course by the initial recovery of hydrocarbons to surface. We look forward to continued clean up of completion fluids from the well, putting us in a position to assess hydrocarbon flow potential. Along with planned testing of additional zones and of the A-2 well, the test will provide key data inputs into the ultimate development plans at West Newton, including the drilling of the deviated well at B-2."

Qualified Person's Statement
Pursuant to the requirements of the AIM Rules - Note for Mining and Oil and Gas Companies, the technical information contained in this announcement has been reviewed by Dr Jeremy Jarvis as a Qualified Person. Jeremy has more than 35 years' experience as a petroleum geologist, holds a BSc in Geology from the University of Dundee and a Ph.D. from Imperial College, University of London. He is a member of the American Association of Petroleum Geologists and the Petroleum Exploration Society of Great Britain.

The future is bright

Once the resources are quantified and proven to be commercially viable, this site will become 'of national importance' and planning will be taken over by central government

"it will get there, little pump and dump before then, enjoy it before it ends"

Or it will go much much higher and your procrastination will have cost you, which I'm sure we will all enjoy

"and up to 5 m by 2030"

The IPCC expects 0.3 to 0.6 meters of sea level rise by 2100

SP still being controlled by the big seller. Hopefully he's clear soon and we can rise again

Everything else is just background noise at the moment

From the RNS:-

The sample of produced oil was taken by Greenfield from the Petroteq Oil Sands Plant ("POSP").

Salinger

"It should also be telling that the samples are from the new tar sands site and not the POSP ore!"

Are you going to apologise for misleading the BB?

" Anything other is desperation and failing to accept what’s happening before your eyes."

Oh yes I see it now. I already have a plant up and running, that I think will produce MSAR with an additional bit of kit. But I'm not going to try it on the existing plant, I'm going to wait until I've built a brand new plant in around 14 months time, before finding out for sure that it will produce MSAR

Pure genius

Salinger

According to the update RNS on 28th June the POSP will continue to be used for proof of concept trial manufacture of 600 barrels

Where is your information that it's dead?

As previously noted, the Commercial Trial Agreement ("CTA") with Greenfield covers testing at the Petroteq Oil Sands Plant ("POSP") located at the Asphalt Ridge Facility in Utah, USA, which is managed by Greenfield. The first phase of the CTA ("Phase 1"), for which Quadrise is being paid $150,000, includes:



· Proof of Concept ("POC") formulation and test work at QRF using oil samples supplied by Greenfield.?

· Loan of Quadrise MSAR® commercial production equipment, test equipment and supply of additives.

· Supply of specialist services and personnel for the commercial scale demonstration trial to produce 600 barrels (100mt) of MSAR®.

"Interesting looks like there will be no revenue from Utah until at least next year 2H22"

Not from the new 5000 bpd facility, but the existing POSP plant at Asphalt Ridge should (?) be producing MSAR much sooner than that, which will kickstart royalty payments

"We were told the Biosmar testing and report would be completed in July. The last working day of July is today!!"

You're premature then

"And they kept all the data for themselves."

Not the same as handing over the IP like you alleged earlier though is it. Still why bother with accuracy when you're FUD spreading

"And the IP, well that was all handed to MAERSK on a plate"

You couldn't be more WRONG

"I assume this will come in the form of a production agreement with a larger refiner, so that's another piece of the puzzle to factor in"

It's not a piece of the puzzle, it's already happened with CEPSA for the Maersk LONO trial. Once demand is created the refiners will want to produce it

Additional 19 metre zone in the upper Kirkham Abbey Formation identified for perforation and flow testing

"Fyoz yes I know it's well planned logistics so why don't they do some of it."

Why don't who, QFI? They're not responsible for the transport of the barrels, a point that has been made several times before

" blimey F1managed to moved 1000's of galloons of racing fuel around the world"

Carefully and well planned logistics BC, nothing like trying to get 3 barrels air freighted

But you know that don't you