Member Info for Fruitsnveg

I should add, the scenario I described is not what I would want, I prefer to see the company not be taken over and go it alone, they are now well set to do so, just what I think could be at play.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-ge-3dprinting-sweden-idINKBN1EL0NC

There are many more examples. They either know of a party for a TO, or they fully expect for 1 or more to step forward after p3. They are not blindly here hoping for a TO, they know there is firm interest, and probably know from who, IMO. I'd be very surprised if this was not the case but DYOR. If P3 is not the result we're hoping for, wait and see how long they remain invested, it could be surprising and telling.....

Its a different company BJW, I think there's a few Polygon's out there, another in Crypto etc

Apologies Woodstock, my mistake for mixing up Rishi and JVT coming from Southampton. Sunak's Southampton connection I meant - it is welcome.

Woodstock, didn't know that, I always assumed he was part of the Oxford set. Good to know. He is taking part in an online lecture at University of Southampton on Monday 24th Jan if anyone is free to register (free even): https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/annual-wade-lecture-in-conversation-with-professor-sir-jonathan-van-tam-tickets-228248556577
The lecture is about:
"Professor Jonathan Van-Tam has played a key role in the UK’s response to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. In this event we will discuss the future landscape of COVID-19, what the evidence has told us about pandemic preparedness, and the crucial benefits that academic and industry collaboration creates."

Agree, it's been discussed to death.

Agree, let's wait and see. We know we are in steady hands.

There s NO way Philip Morris, a non-pharma is the only one interested in a find like Synairgen. Zero chance. IMO.

Remember international reputations are on the spit here, SHH, recently knighted by the Queen, and an and a world first legal precedent set ref air pollution. Philip Morris? It would be the worst M&A deal in history optically.

If it is we are in the $hit.

Not everyone will have seen/heard it though. There were some positive take aways.

It was discussed yesterday, perhaps why.

Not an insane thought Matterhorn, not insane at all....

Could have been a present for SSH on his recent knighthood. He is after all Mr. Synairgen Research.
It can't be for one of Boris' s garden parties because, you know, they're just 'work gatherings'...lol

We will BJW. Just BYOB and it'll all go away, lol

I had to look that up. Most apt Docdaneeka! I'm thinking Munch's 'The Scream' as representative of The US Senate... I pity the poor stenographers that have to sit through these endless hearings.

Sorry there was one other thing I noted below as it relates to BARDA funding but there was no clear answer at the hearing, would be good to know:

Walenski was asked how much BARDA funding is left. Walenski said they will refer back with a figure $ to the Senate.

I think they transcribe these Senate hearing but I'm not sure how they are accessed or if they can by the public later. I'll have a gander.

Oak, I just noted these 3 things as they somewhat impact ref therapeutics. Partially my take, some quoted:

Fauci said there will be invariable a 'next' variant. Regarding Deltacrom, Fauci said "it is not something that the WHO feels is of grave concern now, but "we keep our eye on it". Regarding Omi peak in the USA, he said they may see a peak of Omi in one region of the US, but in another it will lag. Areas will peak at different times in different places as people have varying levels of immunity, behaviours, etc, "America is a big country" he added.

Fauci said we (him/US) are in "constant communication" with Whitty and Valance to know how things are in the UK. I think he mentioned daily calls?

Janet Wood**** went on the record in the Senate hearing, saying "there is still an extreme unmet medical need for therapeautics particularly for late stage of disease going into ICU getting on the ventilator (sic), so robust development is still ongoing in the therapeutic area." Context: She was asked if it was true that BARDA had told industry in the US that there was no longer an unmet medical need for therapeutics. Her answer (above) seems to indicate that was misinformation and it was not true.

Nail on the head Docdaneeka.

Yes Mutting, clearly they don't think it's all over despite what their mouthpieces are sent out to tell Joe public on the street. This I personally view as a positive for Synairgen. They appear to be pro-placing orders despite public messaging.