Member Info for Foxhill

Not withstanding, as Yrabs suggests, a lot of that groundwork should have been done long before being ready to sign - and if not then presumably they considered 30 days sufficient, no?

“They know what they’re doing"

But there’s always something.

Last thought.

If there was any correlation between fully operational and finalising - why was the original LoI for 30 days. A nonsense.

I suspect the LOI was more ‘comfort’ as WSG yeilded and commenced gratis. Time will tell. They “know what they’re doing”. ;-)

Quite what kind of f’in weird arrangement they’ve made and entered into with MPS, their Technical Partner, who ARE presumably being paid (see happy beer waving staff) whilst we aren’t (not very equitable) - PF has only said finalise. Doesn’t necessarily mean sign. Might be months of bureaucracy and ubiquitous complexity to follow.

Probably still sniffing for more expansion of scope.

As has been said, many times before, there is no point in dissecting or drawing inferences from WSG RNS’s.

He’s 200% wide of the mark on 30 days.

Fully operational by end of September is a buying time statement in my view. ‘Not many weeks left until Christmas. Can he do it? Practice makes perfect.

I’ll wager that no cusps materialise six months on from the AGM boIIocks.

Funny posts making me smile.

“Waiting on PF” and “most people”

Have a good weekend all. Enjoy that unseasonal sunshine.

CGAFF. ‘Couldn’t....

I have watched this for a long time - don’t think I’ve ever seen in held in such a tight range - despite several cusps and coming weeks.

Get them to build a state of the art orangerie. And a greenhouse. Tell tell that you’ll give them the contract for the stables and might pay them, if they do a good job on the first two...

Well that’ll be a serious placing :-)

Perhaps we build FOC too?

How long do you have to operate without charge to register for charitable status?

30 days. Know what we’re doing. Nearly 90 days later suggests otherwise irrespective of your chosen eyeware.

If you work out your first question - get ready for more birdsong.

If the entire staff of Bumbly Towers was spotted in the departure lounge of Heathrow all dressed in Ghanaian national dress and party hats, lead by Fowler’s in a suit with pens stapled all over it like a weird version of a Jewish brides dress - the SP wouldn’t budge.

You can’t read much into anything - it’s all been relentlessly unreliable for 10 years probably. Can’t vouch for 9 to ‘12 - but can’t imagine there’s been a massive swing into meaningless RNS’s?

Shouldn’t that be?;

“He was happy to do 2 for the placing” ;-)

Understand.

He won’t. Because he’ll look f’in stupid.

Tardis - so more like 120 days perhaps.

If it was an interview it might be worthwhile - but it never is. It’s a pre-agreed series of questions that enables PF to say what he wants. “Tell me Peter, forgive my irritatingly nasal delivery, what is it currently that WSG specialise in, for those investors out there that can’t keep up with the MSC’s that proliferate but don’t get signed..”
They’re hardly going to say - where’s that bloody Africa contract you were “asked” to sign. What happened to your 30day LoI. How do you manage to get timescales so wrong so consistently, Peter?

That’s been Fowler’s defence since the 2013 AGM.

Just woke up. Doh!!

MSC arrives before that MSC.

I dribble too.

I’m not a number cruncher - but I read elsewhere that WSG are paying ridiculous interest alone on existing borrowing.

That will get (or should) addressed in the event that Tema happens.

I think that some here have pipedream hopes based on just this one MSC.

It might provoke a bit more clarity from Bumbly on other projects in hand and the market might attribute some value to those.

I think a second ‘cusp’ needs to come for significant SP hikes. The sort that ageing LTHers have been waiting for.

No FOMO this Friday.