Gulu30 Jun 2026 10:30
OK so this is just my attempt at reading between the lines (always DYOR). Gulu is really interesting and here's why I think so...
The optimised DFS (May 2026) confirmed that $45M Phase 1 CapEx includes the 3000 tpa Gulu USPG plant, (which from the 2024 MOU we can assume is funded 50/50 with Triessence, Singapore). But how is it so cheap?
Mike confirmed the technical partner is a Chinese powerhouse producing 100ktpa SPG (likely TaiDa or BTR). Using Chinese machinery and expertise keeps the CapEx low and ensures the plant works from day one.
Mike discusses MOU with Triessence (Singapore) and Chinese SPG Partner:
https://youtu.be/HuKMtpWLwsI?is=_4TcKhEwxoyxnQVg
However, this introduces geopolitical friction. Using Chinese equipment and management contracts risks being classified as a Foreign Entity of Concern (FEOC) which could jeopardise eligibility for parts of the US EV incentive market...
There's the possibility that Alkeemia, AETC or another company has stepped in to replace the Chinese partner, but we have no evidence (yet) to suggest this.
So if the governance structure can't avoid FEOC issues, what might the plan look like? One potential solution would be a strict geographic separation of product flows...
The Orom Cross Mine: Raw concentrate remains completely untainted, allowing bulk offtake to flow to Alkeemia (Europe), the US via AETC (Yunasko etc.) and potentially Project Vault, securing the DFC's Phase 2 debt facility.
Gulu Plant: By sacrificing US eligibility to protect the low CapEx, Triessence could then focus sales of the resulting USPG on less restrictive Korean and Japanese OEMs.
It looks like a deliberate dual-market strategy rather than a compromise... low-cost downstream processing for Asian markets, while preserving the flexibility of Orom Cross concentrate for Western supply chains.
IRA-compliant feedstock for the US: Check 🇺🇸
Non-Chinese feedstock for the EU: Check 🇪🇺
In-country USPG for Asian Markets: Check 🌏
Caveats:
While the logic is there, remember the exact identity of the 100ktpa Chinese SPG partner is still unconfirmed by the management. My thesis assumes a partner like TaiDa or BTR based on historical work, but until an official RNS names them, the exact compliance structure remains speculative.
Project finance and strategic tenders are highly complex. While Q3 is the targeted window for tender results and Alkeemia's FID, bureaucratic or legal delays could easily push these milestones into late 2026.
The 'geographic quarantine' strategy relies on US and EU institutions accepting that the raw concentrate is completely insulated from the potentially Chinese-managed Gulu plant. There is always a risk that strict US FEOC audits could look at a company-wide level and flag the project regardless of the suggested ring-fencing.