RE: 52 week high1 Jun 2021 18:47
"this share has a huge potential and could follow in Royal Mail type of re rating, IMO BT should be minimum £3 upwards."
The market narrative has started to change. I've noticed a few articles mentioning the annual cost savings of £1 Billion from 2023, rising to £2 Billion from 2025. I haven't noticed any articles latching on to the Green narrative, resulting from PON and the move to an EV fleet. The PSTN switch off, and power savings from passive access network, plus associated building closures will result in a massive reduction in BT's carbon footprint. I suspect BT will also choose to source electricity from renewables, which could lead to BT becoming a carbon neutral company in 10 years.
There may be another thread to this story, companies like SKY, Google, etc claim to be carbon neutral, but are they? I watch SKY Go, on a laptop connected via an HDMI cable to a TV. I recently binge watched Devils, Westworld, etc, and regularly stream CNBC over SKY Go. I also regularly watch Films and series on BBC Iplayer, Netflix, and Amazon Prime. When users stream content, over telecommunications networks, the power usage of the Network routers spike up to process the extra bandwidth associated with distributing the content. ISP's/Telecom providers are now complaining that Net Neutrality rules are transferring costs onto them, unfairly benefiting the media/content providers. There's an argument that content providers, like Netflix, are broadcasters and they should pay more for streaming their content over IP networks. I read that OFCOM are looking at Net Neutrality in the UK, and BT are presenting an argument around power usage in relation to streaming content. Media/content providers could find themselves on the hook for more costs associated with carbon/power usage for streaming their content, it will be interesting to see if anything comes from BT's argument.