RE: double bottom1 Mar 2023 22:02
"recovering BTC and software 30% faster than anyone else and we take a funding to mine ourselves"
I don't think QBT have the funds to mine commercially and make significant profits. I watched a YouTube Video showing the scale of a Core Scientific mining farm and it suggested a build cost of $1 Billion. Core Scientific went chapter 11, but they're still operating some Mining Farm's as US companies tend to continue operations post Chapter 11.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=82vMOVREXzM
"The US-based firm produced 1,356 and 1,435 self-mined BTC in November and December, respectively, and 795 and 931 bitcoin for colocation customers, respectively.
It operated around 243,000 and 234,000 ASIC servers, bringing its total hashrate to 24.4 EH/s in November and 23.7 EH/s in December. On the other hand, its self-mining computing power for December was 15.7 EH/s, compared to 15.4 EH/s in the prior month."
https://cryptopotato.com/core-scientific-mined-over-1400-btc-in-december-despite-bankruptcy-filing/#:~:text=It%20also%20boosted%20its%20self,end%20of%20December%20last%20year.
The Bitcoin algorithms restrict the daily reward to around 450 BTC mined per day, so Core Scientific's Colo and self mined total for December was 2,366, or around 76 per day (approximately 17% of the daily total, assuming 450 mined per day); Looking at the size of the Core Scientific operation, QBT would have to invest significantly to compete against the big commercial mining farms processing power, even with a 30% speed boost. I'm gobsmacked at the amount of money pumped into the industry, especially since I don't believe Bitcoin has a future.