Member Info for fireheart1

That quote of divid was looking at their two payments per year, interim and final... You got the final I assume of 1.8p.. Just wish we came across AMI in the downturn, would be very rich investors now.... Never mind easy to say now...

I'll answer that myself, as I have just found the previous one.. Interim divd 08: ex div 6/08/08 paid 5/09/08 paid 0.60p

Do you know when the ex div day is ?

Nice to know, thanks. lets hope they find some gold etc in Aus and improve their SP

Same news as posted at the start of the day, but with a different spin on it... http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/business/story/0,28124,25790781-5017996,00.html

Did you read the post from hotcopper i posted here on the EXT sp for a bid (if it comes in)

I assume for that reason you have not got a stop loss set on this one?

I get right niggled with the mm's or trading platforms.. If I want 5000 shares I get quoted 5p If I want £10,000 worth, I have to pay 5.25p... How does that work... ? p.s. I didnt have to do a neg trade to get £10K worth... Which surprised me...

The answer was no...

Reads like one of sages posts. I hope Plagiarism was not used in writing that for the journalist's sake...

25% up in first few mins... The question is will it keep going..

Good reading, but when re-reading take note of: 'Indicated Resource' : That part of a Mineral Resource for which tonnage, densities, shape, physical characteristics, grade and mineral content can be estimated with a reasonable level of confidence. It is based on exploration, sampling and testing information gathered through appropriate techniques from locations such as outcrops, trenches, pits, workings and drill holes. The locations are too widely or inappropriately spaced to confirm geological and/or grade continuity but are spaced closely enough for continuity to be assumed. 'Inferred Resource' :That part of a Mineral Resource for which tonnage, grade and mineral content can be estimated with a low level of confidence. It is inferred from geological evidence and assumed but not verified geological and/or grade continuity. It is based on information gathered through appropriate techniques from locations such as outcrops, trenches, pits, workings and drill holes which may be limited or of uncertain quality and reliability.

http://moneyam.uk-wire.com/cgi-bin/articles/200907160700127325V.html

with the share issue to cyrus, RAB's holding % will drop to well below 25% so what RAB decide is not as important....

I was talking about QGM, a Aus listed stock that AGU has an interest in..

This is a post from a Aussie board for EXT, the poster looks to have allot of votes so I assume he knows what he's taking about. Current EXT SP is A$6.77 "Valuation of uranium takeovers is normally based upon million lbs in the ground multiplied by a value in US$ per pound. This post is not to put up numbers, but to give a handy rule of thumb to convert these two values to a share price in A$. Rule of thumb: @ US$6 per pound - divide by 30 @ US$9 per pound - divide by 20 @ US$12 per pound - divide by 15 Example: Zone 1 + Ida Dome = 170 million lbs indicated + inferred. If that was the only uranium taken into account, and you assumed the lowest possible value in $ per pound, what A$ share price would that be? Answer: @ US$6 per pound - divide by 30 - share price should be 170/30 = A$5.67 Example: If you assumed that Zone 1 + Zone 2 + Ida Dome = 300 million lbs, and you thought that with the excellent grade, cheap extraction and potential for further resource upgrade a value of US$12 per pound was justified, what A$ share price would that be? Answer: @ US$12 per pound - divide by 15 - share price should be 300/15 = A$20 Assumptions: exchange rate US$0.80 = A$1" Reads good, would have thought an inbetween figure is a better figure, but it can let you work out what the value of the holding could be worth...

You may be right, I still cannot find an up to date top shareholders list, the only thing I can see is this... http://www.qgm.com.au/pdf/asx/20070105_substantial_angus_ross.pdf Robin Andrews left QGM in Nov 2008, he did not have any shares in the compnay and held 1M options to QGM shares to be excerised by 30/06/09 at 20c each, considering they are 2.3c I suspect he didnt take that up... http://www.qgm.com.au/documents/675223.pdf

I agree with Brazil, but not AUS stock?.. QGM has signed a JV with Newmont for one project.. The intial cost of the 28% stake in QGM would have been costly. Unless the QGM website is not up to date and AGU have sold out.. Question asked to AGU is the last few weeks: Previously there was a project in Brazil, and Australia linked to your website, are these a going concern? Or are they due to be offloaded, and AGU will concentrate on Greenland? Answer: None of the projects in Brazil had any economic value and St. Andrews Mining Ltd., the holding company, is being wound up. The assets were all pledged as security for local loans and I do not expect there to be any surplus from disposal proceeds.

From looking on their website this is still published: Major shareholder is Angus & Ross plc, listed on London Alternative Investment Market (AIM).

Just had a look on Hotcopper.com.au for QGM, canot see the latest top shareholders, but from the first issue of the top shareholders AGU are on there at 28%, along with RAB Special fund.. Current SP for QGM 2.3c