RE: AIM vs USA10 Nov 2025 12:00
Distinguishing between traders and fundamental investors is near impossible on AIM, as there are so few professional investors for the majority of listed companies outside small -cap & micro funds bar AIM 100 lot, and even there it's selective. Consequence being poor research, limited insittituional ownership, poor liquidity, and a reliance on retail. McNulty is a former analyst so has experience, but he's not the only one here who's ex-FM, analyst or IR....I took a decent amount off the table here over last 2 weeks as the story got heated (nonsense about G7 its apogee) between 55- 67p, as no surprise that the mini bubble burst....and back down we came.
Current Situation:
Some of the heat has been taken out of the sector, but for MKA there remains a fair amount of hopium in the sp, mainly because of expectations around SPAC valuation and timings. The boys really need this to come good otherwise the carefully constructed funding/de-risking strategy could start to unravel. Given the US government shut-down my view is we can forget (unless at front of queue) SPAC listing before Q1 next year, leaving MKA vulnerable to pull-back in stratospheric US ratings, which would, if it happens, crimp the listing and affect the price at which US investors would part with their cash. None of this is in the hands of our guys, so anyone putting in new cash here at the mo. is taking quite a chance. I think you'll find that McNulty would have removed quite a few chips assuming he's done same analysis. Not far fetched that sp retreats back to 25-35p range. Fundamentally, I remain a holder but we are so reliant on other parties to drive the newsflow, that at teh moment discretion is better part of valor.