Member Info for Feeks

Que?

Https://www.apcuk.co.uk/knowledge-base/resource/electric-machines/

Https://www.proteanelectric.com/

Https://zote.info/4eFN0cO

Good sign. IMO this company is nailed on to hit 250p just by doing more of the same.

Hate to have yo point this out to you Tel, but your insistence on being "here to protect your investment" is a negative self fulfilling prophecy because it is you attracting the trolls. Just look at all the votes up whenever someone calls you out on your puerile nonsense.

It fits the facts perfectly, does it not, that the share buy-back continues because there is no need to preserve cash, given the end game is a business sale at what must be hoped will be a premium to the current share price. it may be thought that stock is better than cash on the balance sheet.

Don't be so mean Terry. There are some highly entertaining posts below which certainly made me chuckle. Have you ever considered taking up a non-exec role at Nanoco? Or will it be straight to CEO?

They totally did that. The Board had seen Samsumg make a fortune by not just using Nanoco quantum dots as an enabler but BRANDING the technology in a way that was highly marketable and saleable, and which is ikely never to be repeated. Never again would I expect Nanoco to land up in that postion with the tech effectively achieving household name status. That "value added" utility was totally ignored on the settlement. NANOCO'S remaining tech is the sensor equivalent of a widget and it will always demand high volume but low margin deals. Fat chance of that now. Summerton's chief aim must be to sell the remaining items in what is now a very bare cupboard. Maybe it will be a sale of the IP to STM.... or to Samsung.

Mr Summerton bought a stake and it is highly likely it is for the reasons Kooba has indicated, which in my view would be a quick fire sale of the IP. This would mean the Nanoco business as we all know it is dead, and all within in a timescale that even I did not imagine would be possible.

Of course Mr Summerton might just be a long term investor who is interested in seeing Nanoco's organic business flourish, but to my mind that thesis does not quite fit the facts so well.

I've added last week, simple reasons being that there is something bubbling along in the background and 4-5p has historically proven to be a good time to invest given the share price has see-sawed up and down plenty over the years, and because it has never been leaky. There ought to be something in the news to lift it back up

Hi Gazer

Do you mean this one?

Transense SAWsense Technology Selected for £11 Million EV R&D Project

RNS was released 18/9/245

Tell that to Samsung. They even marketed the IP theft whilst making $$ billions!

A wise man once said the person who always claim to know best probably doesn't.

Here's a look into Nanoco's future:

Unproven low margin produxt easily copied or stolen = business failure. No amount of good marketing will rescue that.

Is there any revenue target for 2025 FYE ? Current market doesn't seem to be looking too far ahead towards a phase of sustainable evenue growth/ profit. That can only be symptomatic of fears for the short term cash position.

Hi Sain

The new staff appears to have added a lot of expense. They can cut that back again if they need to. They oviously do not need to do that or they would not be doing rhen opposite by adding new senior staff just recently. Lots of positive buy signals there ..... also in the form of a large gap up in product sales to support it.

I like Paul. He comes across as a decent person and a sensible investor ....... but surely just hoping for a home run on this one, is he not?

"Following a solid start in H1 2025, Supreme expects trading for the year ended 31 March 2025 ("FY 2025") to be in line with market expectations1."

It should be H1 FY25 and year ENDING 31 March 2025 (not year ended), unless I'm stuck in a time warp.

Pedantry rules :-)

Have I been in a coma.

March 2025,,?

Poole - yes possibly, I had a similar thought as you. It seems a very muted market response, and for one, I was expecting a bigger reaction today on this type of news.