Member Info for Fastfood

Lang Family 10.01% at the time of RNS 13/5 39.661.647 Shares

Jonathan Niall Roberts 3.53% RNS 16/9 14.000.136 Shares

Why are these not declared on Sig Shareholder List ? Exited ? Or under cover of Nominee Accounts and failed to Confirm to Ciz Board at the time they updated the List ?

If the latter it kind of makes the Sig Shareholder List not fit for purpose ?

Thoughts ?

BTW I have a record of the previous SS List and will update you all with the info for comparison. I've been waiting 18 Month for this updated List, only to find more mis direction and smoke and mirrors. Was promised an update every 6 month but that was a fob off.

The Revenue is not guaranteed VIncent. Bio could go into Administration if they don’t achieve their Sales.

In a Nutshell if you have a Product / any Product and you wish to maintain that conduit of extracting value - then I can see the price of that product having to incorporate the Risk to both the environment and the person buying it through Regulation

What this does is continue to justify that products eligibility in the Market, whilst at the same time solidifying Market Share - because the smaller innovative players wanting to come in / cannot compete with the fixed costs of covering the Risk of those Negative impacts associated with the Product.

And World Health Care re all types of Cancer are too at an inflection point imo where they will not continue to foot the bill. The Bill has to be firmly placed on the Product. Period !!

But only 6% take up the offer. In any case if 14 million all said yes / then good luck with getting through that lot.

Surely what you do is get the Tobacco Companies to foot the bill for Full Scale screening for Lung Cancer and that requires Government intervention and consensus. Obviously to be built into the price of a packet of cigarettes. The Risk then is covered (To some extent) by the Tobacco industry and protects their future Sales. Smoke at your own Risk.

Hermit. We are not Cizzle Bio. That is the USA company. BUT given that we are in partnership and that they are a New Company with only 1 piece of Technology ie : Ours !! Then all we can do at this stage is hope that we have something to offer re our Current Test offering some value to Breast Cancer detection also rather than hijack the Event merely on the back of our Lung Cancer tech.

Also due to Neilin response I would now have full confidence it remains 10% as he obvs has a heads up on all things Ciz.

Agree with Brondby. It was the first thing i noticed upon reading RNS that no confirmation of 10%. I fancy it is 10% but with Conditions / Milestones attached which are too complicated to explain as Brondby says. Still .. left guessing..

No info re any progress on other Cancer detection progress from within the Team at York. Leads me to believe that previous info was just Soundbites with no real future value potential.

Neil. Once again..

There is No confirmation of 10% in BIO in either recent RNS or Directors Talk. Both merely state we have a % Ownership but it does not confirm 10%. This is a Binding Agreement so lets have it confirmed yes ??

One would hope 10% and no deviation to the MOU. Hopefully just an oversight but when the Exact % is omitted in both / then i think its fair to ask the Question and have it confirmed.

Ohh and achieving Binding Agreement is Great news and a Big Step to achieving whatever the potential is for the Ciz1B bio marker and its influence on World healthcare.

I wonder why both in the RNS and Director's Talk that AS fails to confirm what percentage share in BIO we are entitled to. One can only continue to seek confirmation if any variation from the MOU. Also no confirmation of whether any extra funding was obtained re Strategic Investment. You never get the full story and that can only be seen as a Negative from the Market / hence no real rise in the SP. $2m over 30 months may serve to keep the lights on. Goodluck to BIO. Suspect Shareholders will foot the Bill via Dilution re Cizz goal of achieving POC Test.

Good old Vince.

Typo.. "Would no longer be aligned would they ?".

My scepticism was re RNS saying Makabo were aligned to Cizz success. If Makabo had sold their rights to their Options then they would aligned would they ? That was my point. However i don't know if they could do this but then again if someone offered then £1 a Share they absolutely would wouldn't they ? I am saying it may be possible that Niall Roberts offered them a cash exchange for their Options.

What if Niall Roberts offered say 2.2p for those Options and Makabo accepted the deal. Would then Niall Roberts have to declare >3% as he would then have Shares + the 2.5m in Options. Do you have to declare Options as part of your Total holding ?

I just wonder if Niall Roberts took on those options from Makabo ? Could this be done ? I dunno ? Seems if they had 0.5% Issued roughly and he gone up 0.5% then …. Dunno. It’s a monster mash.

Who’s Chris Cook Joey ?? Significance to Cizzle ?

Because Joey I never saw 2 million + Shares bought. Maybe possible over a 2wk period. 200k at a time ?

Also / Makabo services rendered are for 6 months only. From July and finish in December. 6 weeks to go then.

Something has to give.

They cannot keep fudging it.

I get you Joey / so how did Niall Roberts up his holding by minimum of 0.5% ? I cannot believe he bought them on open Market..

JN Roberts and Frazer Lang are both Directors at Fluechem - York. Frazer Lang born 1990 son of Martin Lang.

If JN Roberts and Lang have 3.5% and 9% ? = 12.5% / then that’s got to be not far off a £1million ??