We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
One reason for the multiple buys and sells capped around 250.000 is that the Investor could probably not get a Live Quote if he/she/they wanted say a net million. And with there only being 2 million in the pot 2 to 2.5 / surely all set for take off on any good news ?
Market behaviour was a proven concept yesterday. We know 2 million Net Buys takes this to 2.5. Repeated again today. Beyond 2.5 we don’t know what’s there yet. Interesting. Cannot see it breaking 2.5 / 2.75 until Allan confirms Working Capital position for next 12 month.
Between the Team they hold some 48 million Shares as Options so I’d say they are all well placed and aligned with achieving a successful conclusion. Allan on a cool 14 million and Dawn 17 million ? RNS back in March 23 off memory.
Personally I’m ok with CEO not buying on open Market as he remains solely aligned via his Options.
Also regard dealing with Cancer I think it important it remain that way - Conservative approach to Shareholding by CEO ie : Just via Options / to buy on open Market could lend itself to skewed decision making regard deals and self interest / where as as now it’s all aligned to the Company outcome. Just my take on things.
He holdeth no shares. IMO Allan is purposely not communicating with the Private Investor. Only the bare minimum via RNS. Following advice from the Americans ? Radio Silence. The Significant Shareholders will be communicated to regularly. So there is a split.
Looks to me like a Day Trader who saw opportunity after 3 month decline to purchase 2 million and probably end up retaining 1 million of it by end of the day. Net profit around £2/£300 Good work imo esp considering the spread.
Yes Brondby Good Post.
The calculations re Cost are skewed / because very quickly you are going to have a multiple of people needing support / treatment. The goal has to be to reduce the average age upon which person is screened. Thus completing Full population screening. This is how you work towards complete eradication of Lung Cancer and “others”.
The Cost will surely go up for Treatment due to Full population screening and Treatment over now multiple years. But then again / We will know who possesses the faulty Ciz1b gene won’t we ?
Tectonic. Forgive my innocence but I would say the World has never had a Plan for an outcome of Cancer detection so early in the process ? I think they better formulate one if tens of thousands are going to asking / expecting help.
At the moment 99% of detection is too late.
That’s going to completely flip if this Test is the real deal.
Demand for a Care Pathway will multiply exponentially and over multiple years instead of end of life. That in itself will be an astronomical cost.
The Test has to be part of a complete integrated package.
So for me / Care pathway infrastructure has to be good to go before you begin production en mass. To say this is nothing to do with Ciz is a bit naive imo.
If you want to work towards completely eradicating Lung Cancer / you have to firstly convince the patient to have the Test or “A” Test. Treatment to begin early but now over 30 years instead of 5 ? If you can demonstrate to the patient that a Care Pathway is in place which extends life expectancy / then you’d like to think the patient would choose to complete the Test.
If there was no real Care Pathway and only potentially bad news / you’d think the patient would avoid the Test like the plague !! ie : No Consent.
Now / Integrate the Test into en mass blood screening for 40yr MOT / then once again / You’d better have a Care in place to support. For potentially 10’s/20’s of thousands of patients per Annum.
Everything needs to be aligned before you make the Test available to the public / and esp mass screening.
Zzzzzz…
You have 1000 positive Tests. Ok you are now at early stage lung cancer which means / untreated / your life expectancy is reduced to between X and Y. I’m sorry but we haven’t any Treatment available but have a nice day.
Not going to happen is it ? You need to make sure you have adequate Care pathway Treatment available so that you can extend life if untreated. I maintain / you need this as part of the Plan before you sign off on Production. To do so otherwise is irresponsible.
What you gonna do with 100.000 Positive Tests ?
People will only take the Test if they know that a Positive result will lead to an increased chance of extending life expectancy.
Happy to discuss further.
Night.
It’s all about Cost. If the cost comes in at £100 / then that would capture 10x more potential than one currently costing £1000/£1500. So then you have those people knocking at your door. Heck / Alan quotes the numbers Worldwide. The fact our Test is designed to eliminate the competition on Price and Reliability / Tells me this will go mass production. So once again / you better be able to cope with demand for care pathway Post Test.
Au Revior.
If end to end care pathway / infrastructure is not able to cope with potential rise in demand as a result of the Test / then one would think someone would look at buying us out to put us on the shelf so to speak (To buy time). Heck / We would need to Sell as we have no money. We would want to Sell / They would want to buy. Always a possibility.
I really don’t think you can Start Production unless end to end Care infrastructure is in place. Maybe someone with experience in pharma could discuss this topic.
Good evening.
No haven’t changed my mind as I am still Invested. I have realised I may need more patience.
Imagine a World where by the Faulty gene is not only identified but removed upon a Positive Test. Now… in that situation Every man and his dog would be having a Test yes ? Wouldn’t that be something.
So getting to Production phase means lots of connotations. In fact it’s massive. So for that reason / I don’t think that it will happen in next RNS.