RE: Takeover16 May 2023 23:09
"You appear to try throwing at me inaccurate or vague info to divert people from the fact you cannot substantiate your claims."
NO sir it is you who are trying to airbrush history.
Your knowledge of Corporate responsiblity is completely incorrect. It is a Company Secretary's role to respond to and provide information to Shareholders. Is that clear enough for you?
Correct the Charge record is 3rd May. Did you see the previous Charge (2nd May), both linked to Barclays the New Funders ( HSBC/BNP Paribas were not prepared to increase their exposure).
Have you read the Charge documents fully? Yes it is usual for a funder to record charges on Companies House. I have seen 100's of Charge Notices over time and rarely seen ones that are so clearly set out regarding Interest Arrears, possible Liquidation etc. These are powerful statements that reflect the previous performance on failed Loan repayments.
Rather than attempting to delete the history others remind new investors about, you would be better to THOROUGHLY examine and research past events, financial and organisational.
There are many who pick up shares that are at an almost all time low and then pump to make a quick profit. Those investors need to ask why is the stock so low? It can be a variety of factors, sector out of favour, economic issues, company miss management, over-borrowed and unable to grow as planned. Marstons have over-borrowed, missed an opportunity to reduce debt 3 years ago, when the likes of MAB and Whitbread raised equity. In the case of MAB their debt was significantly reduced, Whitbread did not need the raise, but did so to create a War-chest.
Lejjb, I could go on but you clearly dispise those with knowledge.
Best of luck with your investments
Sign In
Follow the stocks
